Ε´/ε Violates Bell's Inequality
نویسندگان
چکیده
We formulate a set of Bell's inequalities for the system of two correlated neutral kaons coming from the decay of a φ-meson, without assuming CP and CP T invariance. We show that a non-vanishing value of the phenomenological parameter ε ′ would violate such inequalities, ruling out Bell's locality.
منابع مشابه
A simple proof of Kashin’s decomposition theorem∗†
Compressive Sensing techniques are used in a short proof of Kashin’s decomposition theorem generalized to `p-spaces for p ≤ 1. The proof is based on the observation that the null-space of a properly-sized matrix with restricted isometry property is almost Euclidean when endowed with the `p-quasinorm. Kashin’s decomposition theorem states that, for any integer m ≥ 1, `2m 1 is the orthogonal sum ...
متن کاملBell inequalities for entangled kaons and their unitary time evolution
We investigate Bell inequalities for neutral kaon systems from Φ resonance decay to test local realism versus quantum mechanics. We emphasize the unitary time evolution of the states, that means we also include all decay product states, in contrast to other authors. Only this guarantees the use of the complete Hilbert space. We develop a general formalism for Bell inequalities including both ar...
متن کاملA Fundamental Inequality of Algebroidal Function
and Applied Analysis 3 radius δ ∈ 0, 1/2 . For φ, ε∗, ε 0 < ε∗ < ε, φ1 < φ − ε < φ − ε∗ < φ ε∗ < φ ε < φ2 , and R > R∗ > 2, we have ( q − 2)S(Ω(φ − ε∗, φ ε∗), R∗,W) n ( Ω ( φ − ε, φ ε), R, ̃ Rz ) q ∑ j 1 n ( Ω ( φ − ε, φ ε), R,W aj ) 256vπ24 lnR δ38 ε − ε∗ lnR − lnR∗ ( q − 2)S ( Ω ( φ − ε∗, φ ε∗, 1 R∗ ,W ))
متن کاملBell inequality for arbitrary many settings of the analyzers
A generalization of the CHSH-Bell inequality to arbitrary many settings is presented. The singlet state of two spin 1 2 violates this inequality for all numbers of setting. In the limit of arbitrarily large number of settings, the violation tends to the finite ratio 4 π ≈ 1.27.
متن کاملMaximal inequality and Large Deviations 6.1 Kolmogorov’s maximal inequality
Proof. To see L2-convergence, we will prove that (Sn)n>1 is Cauchy in L 2. It is enough to show that ||Sn − Sm||2 < ε for all n,m > N(ε). Suppose n > m, then we obtain ||Sn − Sm||2 = E(Sn − Sm) = E(Xm+1 +Xm+2 + · · ·+Xn) = Var(Xm+1 +Xm+2 + · · ·+Xn) = Var(Xm+1) + Var(Xm+2) + · · ·+ Var(Xn). For any ε > 0, there exists N = N(ε) with ∑∞ i=N Var(Xi) < ε 2, thus we have ||Sn−Sm||2 < ε for all n,m >...
متن کامل