Input third-degree price discrimination by congestible facilities
نویسنده
چکیده
This paper studies third-degree price discrimination by transport facilities, such as airports and seaports, which sell access to the infrastructure as a necessary input for downstream production. These facilities are prone to congestion –which makes downstream markets interrelated– and their ownership structure is diverse, varying from public (domestic welfare maximizing) to private (profit maximizing). We show that input price discrimination by a private supplier can increase aggregate output and increase welfare in a setting where, in absence of congestion, output does not change and welfare is reduced when price discrimination is allowed. Therefore, the presence of negative consumption externalities enlarges the extent to which input price discrimination is desirable. We also analyze the effects of price discrimination by a public facility and describe the conditions under which banning input price discrimination is efficient for both types of ownership forms. We argue that there is a limited scope for this to occur, which suggests that the current practice of enforcing a broad ban on input price discrimination that covers congestible facilities with different ownership forms may have to be revised.
منابع مشابه
The Impact of CSR and Semi-TDPD on Price-Based Revenue Sharing Contract
We develop a new coordination contract of manufacturer-retailer in a distribution system. A revenue sharing contract based on retail price is modelled, which is more practical to handle channel conflict. We also integrate two concepts of CSR (Corporate Sociality Responsible) and Semi-TDPD (Semi Third Degree Price Discrimination) into our model. Semi-TDPD strategy makes it possible to exploit th...
متن کاملThe Welfare Effects of Third Degree Price Discrimination In Intermediate Good Markets: The Case of Bargaining
This paper examines the welfare effects of third degree price discrimination by an intermediate good monopolist selling to downstream firms with bargaining power. One of the downstream firms (the “chain store”) may have a greater ability than rivals to integrate backward into the supply of the input. In addition to this outside option, the firms’ relative bargaining powers depend on their disag...
متن کاملWelfare and output in third-degree price discrimination: A note
In this note I provide examples to show that, contrary to what is widely believed, when changing from an uniform price to a third-degree price discrimination situation, an improvement in welfare is possible with output reduction, if there is more than one firm.
متن کاملThird-degree Price Discrimination
IN THE LITERATURE OF monopolistic third-degree price discrimination, it has been widely held that a change in aggregate Marshallian social welfare by price discrimination is negative if total output decreases. Among others, Schwartz [1990] verifies this conjecture for any total cost function that depends only on total output, not on its distribution among markets. Letting ∆X and ∆W denote a cha...
متن کاملPrice of anarchy is maximized at the percolation threshold.
When many independent users try to route traffic through a network, the flow can easily become suboptimal as a consequence of congestion of the most efficient paths. The degree of this suboptimality is quantified by the so-called price of anarchy (POA), but so far there are no general rules for when to expect a large POA in a random network. Here I address this question by introducing a simple ...
متن کامل