An Application of Popper’s Method of Conjectures and Refutations to the Critique of Emerging Construction Theories
نویسنده
چکیده
Karl Popper’s method of conjectures and refutationsis used as a framework to analyze and critique emerging construction theories. A perceived problem initiates the quest for tentative theories and error elimination as a solution. However, according to Popper, the result is a new version of the problem or an unintended consequence that creates anemergingproblem. The method of conjectures and refutations is a novel gateway into critiquing current theories by challenging the finding of a solution that does not in itself create a problem. From Popper’s theory we can paraphrase the following hypothesis: All problems seek solutions that create new problems. As society endeavors to solve today’s problems, we do not have the luxury of creating even bigger ones, directly or indirectly, intended or unintended. Therefore it is incumbent that researchers ask: what are the possible problems that our current theories and solutions may create in the short or long term? Popper’s method of conjectures and refutations offers a new way of critiquing existing theories and, in future work, evaluating the tools of Lean Construction as they are applied to solving real problems.
منابع مشابه
A Justification For Popper’s Non-Justificationism
Based on a somewhat simple thesis that we can learn from our mistakes despite our fallibility, Karl Popper develops a non-justificationist theory of knowledge and of its growth. According to Popper (1989), knowledge, especially scientific knowledge, grows through unjustified conjectures (i.e. tentative solutions to our problems), which are controlled by criticism, or attempted refutations (incl...
متن کاملPopularizing Ethical Theories (A Critique of Adel Zaher’s Theory of Popular Ethisc)
Popularization domain has also covered the scientific theories and among them, theories of popularized ethics have emerged. Focusing on human mind and its independence, popularized ethics simply takes human mind, rather than religion, as the ultimate reference of ethical criteria as well as the norms governing the human characteristics and behavior. Rejecting the religious ethics, Adel Zaher, A...
متن کاملThe new NDT series Ideas, Conjectures and Refutations (ICR): elegance in nephrology research.
The new NDT series Ideas, Conjectures and Refutations (ICR): elegance in nephrology research In this issue of NDT, we inaugurate the new series of papers Ideas, Conjectures and Refutations (ICR). This new feature of our journal is sister to Polar Views in Nephrology and aims at creating a special space to host novel scientific ideas, amenable to empirical falsification and well-reasoned proposa...
متن کاملComparative Study of Architectural Phenomenology in Theories of Juhani Pallasmaa and Steven Holl
Phenomenology as one of the philosophical fields of the twentieth century, was used in the last decades of this century as an effective approach to better understanding in architectural theorizing. The present study examines the viewpoints of Juhani Pallasmaa and Steven Holl through their key concepts, with the aim of showing the commonalities and differences of their views and explaining more ...
متن کاملEvaluation of Corporate Governance Practices in Emerging Markets (A case study of Nigerian Banking Industry)
This study explores corporate governance practices within the context of the Nigerian banking industry using instances of corporate governance lapses that resulted in part to the Nigerian banking crises. We present multiple case analysis of publicly available documents and court papers (in the United Kingdom and Nigeria) to document instances of breach and areas of weakness in the existing Nige...
متن کامل