The z-difference can be used to measure covariate balance in matched propensity score analyses.

نویسنده

  • Oliver Kuss
چکیده

OBJECTIVES The propensity score (PS) method is increasingly used to assess treatment effects in nonrandomized trials. Although there are several methods to use the PS for analysis, matching treated and untreated patients by the PS is recommended by most researchers among other reasons because this allows assessing covariate balance before and after matching. Although the standardized difference is commonly applied to compute a measure of balance, it has two deficiencies: its distribution depends on the sample size and one cannot compare standardized differences for baseline covariates on different scales, that is, continuous, binary, ordinal, or nominal covariates. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING We introduce the z-difference to measure covariate balance in matched PS analyses and illustrate it by a recent matched PS analysis from cardiac surgery. RESULTS The z-difference is simple to calculate, can be used with second moments for continuous covariates, and in most cases can also be computed from published data. Its full advantage emerges after displaying z-differences in a Q-Q plot, which allows balance comparisons with respect to (1) a randomized trial and (2) a perfectly matched PS analysis in the sense of Rubin and Thomas. CONCLUSION The z-difference can be used to measure covariate balance in matched PS analyses.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Using the Cross-Match Test to Appraise Covariate Balance in Matched Pairs

Having created a tentative matched design for an observational study, diagnostic checks are performed to see whether observed covariates exhibit reasonable balance, or alternatively whether further effort is required to improve the match. We illustrate the use of the cross-match test as an aid to appraising balance on high-dimensional covariates, and we discuss its close logical connections to ...

متن کامل

Evaluation of subset matching methods and forms of covariate balance.

This paper conducts a Monte Carlo simulation study to evaluate the performance of multivariate matching methods that select a subset of treatment and control observations. The matching methods studied are the widely used nearest neighbor matching with propensity score calipers and the more recently proposed methods, optimal matching of an optimally chosen subset and optimal cardinality matching...

متن کامل

Metrics for covariate balance in cohort studies of causal effects.

Inferring causation from non-randomized studies of exposure requires that exposure groups can be balanced with respect to prognostic factors for the outcome. Although there is broad agreement in the literature that balance should be checked, there is confusion regarding the appropriate metric. We present a simulation study that compares several balance metrics with respect to the strength of th...

متن کامل

Social determinants of disparities in weight among US children and adolescents.

PURPOSE To explore whether contextual variables attenuate disparities in weight among 18,639 US children and adolescents aged 2 to 18 years participating in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2001 to 2010. METHODS Disparities were assessed using the Symmetrized Rényi Index, a new measure that summarizes disparities in the severity of a disease, as well as the prevalence, ac...

متن کامل

Parametric and Nonparametric Covariate Balancing Propensity Score for General Treatment Regimes∗

Propensity score matching and weighting are popular methods when estimating causal effects in observational studies. Beyond the assumption of unconfoundedness, however, these methods also require the model for propensity score to be correctly specified. The recently proposed covariate balancing propensity score (CBPS) methodology weakens this assumption by directly optimizing sample covariate b...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Journal of clinical epidemiology

دوره 66 11  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2013