Rhazes in the Renaissance of Andreas Vesalius
نویسنده
چکیده
Andreas Vesalius' (1514-64) first publication was a Paraphrasis of the ninth book of the Liber ad Almansorem, written by the Arab-Persian physician and alchemist Rhazes (854-925). The role of Rhazes in Vesalius' oeuvre has thus far been much disregarded. The different ways Rhazes recurs reveal an intellectual evolution in Vesalius' work. In the Paraphrasis, Vesalius subjects Rhazes to the authority of Galen in the context of the early sixteenth-century humanist campaign for the substitution of Arab influences by Greek 'originals'. Over the years Vesalius continues his work on Rhazes, but his approach becomes more internationalistic. Ultimately, Vesalius criticises Galen while expressing sympathy for the Arab author. This may be the more significant as Rhazes could have influenced Vesalius in the act of criticising Galen - critical discussions of Galen were available to Vesalius in Latin translations of Rhazes's Liber Continens. Although Vesalius never refers to the work, it is hardly possible he was unaware of it: similarities in structure, rhetoric and form between the Continens and the De humani corporis fabrica could support this hypothesis.
منابع مشابه
Andreas Vesalius as a renaissance innovative neuroanatomist: his 5 centenary of birth Andreas Vesalius como neuroanatomista inovador renascentista: seu 5° centenário de nascimento
Andreas Vesalius (1514-1564) is considered the Father of Modern Anatomy, and an authentic representative of the Renaissance. His studies, founded on dissection of human bodies, differed from Galeno, who based his work on dissection of animals, constituted a notable scientific advance. Putting together science and art, Vesalius associated himself to artists of the Renaissance, and valued the ima...
متن کاملVersions of vesalius.
Andreas Vesalius reformed anatomical knowledge and teaching in the Renaissance by adopting Galenic methods from the classical past. His careful drawings revealed the human body in unprecedented and realistic detail, but the images of himself were more ambiguous.
متن کاملAndreas Vesalius on the larynx and hyoid bone: an annotated translation from the 1543 and 1555 editions of De humani corporis fabrica.
TRANSLATORS' NOTE Vesalius' training in anatomy was firmly rooted in the Galenic school of medicine, and it was Galen who, like one ofthe present translators, had a particular interest in the larynx and its surrounding anatomy. 1 Although he was not completely free of Galen's reliance on animal models,2 Vesalius' account of the structure of the larynx is substantially accurate, and can be verif...
متن کاملLeonardo da Vinci and Andreas Vesalius; the shoulder girdle and the spine, a comparison.
Leonardo Da Vinci and Andreas Vesalius were two important renaissance persons; Vesalius was a surgeon-anatomist who delivered innovative work on the study of the human body, Leonardo da Vinci was an artist who delivered strikingly accurate and beautiful drawings on the human body. Below we compare both masters with regard to their knowledge of the working of the muscles, their method and system...
متن کاملVesalius and Paracelsus.
Introduction As we commemorate the four hundredth anniversary of the death of Andreas Vesalius, our thoughts may turn to another sixteenth-century figure who made an epoch-making contribution to medicine: to Paracelsus.1 At first glance, they seem as much alike as fire and water. Their life and work had its setting in different cultural milieus. The tempestuous character of the German reformati...
متن کامل