Legislative Drafting Guidelines: How Different Are They from Controlled Language Rules for Technical Writing?
نویسنده
چکیده
While human-oriented controlled languages developed and applied in the domain of technical documentation have received considerable attention, language control exerted in the process of legislative drafting has, until recently, gone relatively unnoticed by the controlled language community. This paper considers existing legislative drafting guidelines from the perspective of controlled language. It presents the results of a qualitative comparison of the rule sets of four German-language legislative drafting guidelines from Austria, Germany and Switzerland with a representative collection of controlled language rules published by the German Professional Association for Technical Communication. The analysis determines the extent to which the respective rule sets control the same or similar aspects of language use and identifies the main differences between legislative drafting guidelines and controlled language rules for technical writing. Posted at the Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich ZORA URL: https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-63553 Published Version Originally published at: Höfler, Stefan (2012). Legislative drafting guidelines: How different are they from controlled language rules for technical writing? In: Kuhn, Tobias; Fuchs, Norbert E. Controlled Natural Language Third International Workshop, CNL 2012. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer Verlag, 138-151. Legislative Drafting Guidelines: How Different Are They from Controlled Language Rules for Technical Writing?
منابع مشابه
From Drafting Guideline to Error Detection: Automating Style Checking for Legislative Texts
This paper reports on the development of methods for the automated detection of violations of style guidelines for legislative texts, and their implementation in a prototypical tool. To this aim, the approach of error modelling employed in automated style checkers for technical writing is enhanced to meet the requirements of legislative editing. The paper identifies and discusses the two main s...
متن کاملControlling Ambiguities in Legislative Language
Legislative language exhibits some characteristics typical of languages of administration that are particularly prone to eliciting ambiguities. However, ambiguity is generally undesirable in legislative texts and can pose problems for the interpretation and application of codified law. In this paper, we demonstrate how methods of controlled natural languages can be applied to prevent ambiguitie...
متن کاملFormal Models for a Legislative Grammar. Explicit Text Amendment
In this paper we will present a method for mining information within legal texts, in particular in regards to corpora of statutes. Text mining, or more in general Information Extraction, can provide a valuable help to people involved in research about the linguistic structure of statutes, and, as a side effect can be the seed for a new generation of applications for the validation and conversio...
متن کاملModels of "Novelle" and Normative Grammar
In this paper we will present a method for mining information within legal texts, in particular in regards to corpora of statutes. Text mining, or more in general Information Extraction, can provide valuable help to people involved in research about the linguistic structure of statutes, and, as a side effect can be the seed for a new generation of applications for validation and conversion in t...
متن کاملTranslation , controlled languages , generation
In this chapter we explore the relationship between translation and controlled languages (CLs). These are stringent sets of writing rules or guidelines designed to prevent authors from introducing ambiguities into their texts, and they are increasingly used in the commercial world for authoring technical documents such as maintenance and user manuals. Very often, these documents then serve as t...
متن کامل