A Sequent Calculus for Reasoning in Four-Valued Description Logics
نویسنده
چکیده
Description Logics (DLs, for short) provide a logical reconstruction of the so-called frame-based knowledge representation languages. Originally, four-valued DLs have been proposed in order to develop expressively powerful DLs with tractable subsumption algorithms. Recently, four-valued DLs have been proposed as a model for (multimedia) document retrieval. In this context, the main reasoning task is instance checking. Unfortunately, the known subsumption algorithms for four-valued DLs, based on \structural" subsumption, do not work with respect to the semantics proposed in the DL-based approach to document retrieval. Moreover, they are unsuitable for solving the instance checking problem, as this latter problem is more general than the subsumption problem. We present an alternative decision procedure for four-valued DLs with the aim to solve these problems. The decision procedure is a sequent calculus for instance checking. Since in general the four-valued subsumption problem can be reduced to the four-valued instance checking problem, we obtain a decision procedure for the subsumption problem. Some related complexity results will be presented.
منابع مشابه
Elimination of Cuts in First-order Finite-valued Logics
A uniform construction for sequent calculi for finite-valued first-order logics with distribution quantifiers is exhibited. Completeness, cut-elimination and midsequent theorems are established. As an application, an analog of Herbrand’s theorem for the four-valued knowledgerepresentation logic of Belnap and Ginsberg is presented. It is indicated how this theorem can be used for reasoning about...
متن کامل(Hyper)sequent Calculi for the ALC(S4) Description Logics
Description logics (DL) form a well-known family of knowledge representation languages. One of its main applications is on the Semantic Web as a reasoning framework in the form of the Ontology Web Language (OWL). In this paper, we propose a cut-free tree hypersequent calculus for terminological reasoning in the Description Logic ALC. We show the calculus is sound and complete. Also, an implemen...
متن کاملBiconsequence Relations: A Four-Valued Formalism of Reasoning with Inconsistency and Incompleteness
We suggest a general formalism of four-valued reasoning, called biconsequence relations, intended to serve as a logical framework for reasoning with incomplete and inconsistent data. The formalism is based on a four-valued semantics suggested by Belnap. As for the classical sequent calculus, any fourvalued connective can be defined in biconsequence relations using suitable introduction and elim...
متن کاملA Sequent Calculus for a Paraconsistent Nonmonotonic Logic ?
In spite of sequent calculus being an appealing tool for describing logical systems, its use along with nonmonotonic logics has been largely neglected. Reasons may be the hardness in implementing a context sensitive mechanism able to detect changes in the theory. This seems to brake the locality of context of sequent rules. Nevertheless, a nonmo-notonic sequent calculus may be helpful if result...
متن کاملDissertation Abstract Semantic Investigation of Proof Systems for Non-classical Logics
Ever since the introduction of sequent calculi for classical and intuitionistic logic by Gentzen [20], sequent calculi have been widely applied in the fields of proof theory, computational logic, and automated deduction. These systems and their natural generalizations (such as many-sided sequent and hypersequent calculi) provide suitable proof-theoretic frameworks for a huge variety of non-clas...
متن کامل