Immune status of PIC Camborough-15 sows, 25% Meishan sows, and their offspring kept indoors and outdoors.
نویسندگان
چکیده
Newer genetic lines of pigs are being used in indoor and outdoor production systems. The objectives of Exp. 1 were to describe the effects of the maternal sow line genotype, environment (indoor vs outdoor), and the genotype x environment interactions on blood hemoglobin (Hb), immunoglobulin G (IgG) concentrations, white blood cell (WBC) numbers, lymphocyte transformation/blastogenesis (LTA), natural killer (NK) cell activity, neutrophil chemotaxis, cortisol concentrations, and leukocyte differentials. Studies were performed using two genotypes: PIC Experimental-94 (Exp-94, an experimental line containing 25% Meishan) and PIC Camborough-15 (C-15). The Exp-94 sows had lower LTA at 0.2 microg/mL mitogen than the C-15 sows, whereas Exp-94 sows had higher NK cytotoxicity than the C-15 sows. When indoors, the two genotypes showed similar neutrophil chemotaxis. When outdoors, the C-15 genotype had higher (P < .01) neutrophil chemotaxis than the Exp-94 sows. The other immune measures were statistically similar for the two genotypes for each environment and for the genotype x environment interaction of sows. Experiment 2 sought to determine the effects of genotype on the immune system of nursery-age offspring of the experimental lines. Each sow line was bred to a common PIC 405 boar line. The Exp-94 x 405 pigs had elevated WBC numbers than C-15 x 405 pigs. The social status of the Exp-94 x 405 or the C-15 x 405 pigs showed no effect on any of the immune measures studied. The other immune measures were statistically similar for the two lines of pigs. The Exp-94 line had marginally increased NK activity but reduced lymphocyte blastogenesis and neutrophil chemotaxis compared with the C-15 line.
منابع مشابه
Farrowing hut design and sow genotype (Camborough-15 vs 25% Meishan) effects on outdoor sow and litter productivity.
Performance measures were evaluated for 125 outdoor sows and litters of two crossbred genotypes (Camborough-15 and 25% Meishan) and in two farrowing hut designs (American-style and English-style hut). Contemporary breeding groups of second-parity sows were evaluated in an intensive, outdoor research unit. Sow genotype and hut designs were arranged factorially. Seven complete blocks were evaluat...
متن کاملThe effect of farrowing environment and previous experience on the maternal behaviour of sows in indoor pens and outdoor huts.
Outdoor farrowing huts facilitate a less restricted maternal behaviour in sows compared with sows kept indoors in farrowing pens. The aim of our study was to investigate whether there are behavioural differences between primiparous sows kept outdoors in farrowing huts and indoors in pens, and whether the maternal behaviour during the second parity, when all sows were kept outdoors in farrowing ...
متن کاملAlternative Sow Housing Systems : Driven by legislation , regulation , free trade and free market systems ( but not science )
Sow housing in the broadest sense refers to how sows are kept. Sows may be kept indoors or outdoors in a variety of systems. Penning with indoor or outdoor systems differ substantially. Outdoors, sows are almost never kept in crates or stalls but rather in pens or pastures of various sizes that allow social grouping. Indoors, sows may be kept in individual crates, stalls or tethers or in pens o...
متن کاملOral/nasal/facial and other behaviors of sows kept individually outdoors on pasture, soil or indoors in gestation crates
The behavior of individually kept PIC Camboroughsows was compared when they were housed in three systems: pasture, soil or gestation crates. All sows were fed 2.0 kg of fortified, sorghum-soybean diet each day. Crated sows were divided into two groups: those fed meal and those fed pellets. As is common among sows on pasture and soil, outdoor sows were fed pellets. Eight sows per treatment were ...
متن کاملIntensive indoor versus outdoor swine production systems: genotype and supplemental iron effects on blood hemoglobin and selected immune measures in young pigs.
The objectives of Exp. 1 were to determine the effects of production system and genotype on pig performance and health. Sows were bred, gestated, farrowed, and lactated in either an intensive indoor or an intensive outdoor production system. The three dam genotypes of pigs used in each environment were PIC Camborough-15 (C-15), PIC Camborough Blue (CB), and Yorkshire x Landrace (YL). All pigs r...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Journal of animal science
دوره 78 10 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2000