Who decides who decides?

نویسنده

D N Michael

چکیده

what counts as wise? Second, does the public, after considerable thought, think that our society has a moral obligation to pursue lines of research which may benefit present and future generations? I say “moral obligation” because it is sometimes implied by advocates of recombinant D N A research that science would be guilty of a sin of omission if it did not continue and promote research so promising in theoretical and practical benefits. I would prefer to say that the research is desirable and valuable, but by no means is it! morally obligatory. It is just one choice among many we can make in allocating our scientific resources. But I would like to know what the public-after due consideration-thinks about all that. Third, what does the public think about risks and benefits? How, in some rational way, ought the public to think about that problem? One obvious implication of this line of thinking is that the public has as much obligation to act responsibly as does the scientific community. The calls for socially responsible scientists could well be matched with some concern about a socially responsible public. The future of the recombinant D N A debate will depend on the quality of the dialogue between the scientific community and the public. Neither side can conduct the debate on its own. The public must be kept informed in the future, must have a central role in present policy formation, and must develop standards by which to judge the issues. Scientists must bring their knowledge, and just as important, their lack of knowledge out into the open, not just once but again and again. The public and the scientific community have now begun to talk. This marriage can be saved.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Fetal survival--who decides?

In this paper Iain McFadyen highlights a modern ethical dilemma. In each case the fetus was recognised to be in danger, but in both cases the advice given in the fetal interest was refused by the mothers. Both the mother and the physician were concerned for the fetus, but their differing actions and reasons pose the dilemma--who decides?

متن کامل

Decision making for incompetent patients: who decides and by what standards?

This Casenote/Comment is brought to you for free and open access by TU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Tulsa Law Review by an authorized editor of TU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Recommended Citation Samantha Weyrauch, Decision Making for Incompetent Patients: Who Decides and by What Standards, 35 Tulsa L. J. 765 (2...

متن کامل

Double Crowding-Out Effects of Means-Tested Public Provision for Long-Term Care

Publicly provided long-term care (LTC) insurance with means-tested benefits is suspected to crowd out either private saving or informal care. This contribution predicts crowding-out effects for both private saving and informal care for policy measures designed to relieve the public purse from LTC expenditure such as more stringent means testing and increased taxation of inheritance. These effec...

متن کامل

Who Decides in Giving to Education? A Study of Charitable Giving by Married Couples

www.palgrave-journals.com/ijea Abstract Using data from the Center on Philanthropy Panel Study and the Panel Study on Income Dynamics, we analyzed whether husbands or wives were more likely to determine whether and how much money to donate to educational institutions. Among donor households, we are able to examine what socio-economic-demographic factors explain differences in whether men or wom...

متن کامل