Sperm are promiscuous and CatSper is to blame….

A sperm-specific cation channel (CatSper) facilitates the entry of calcium necessary for rapid changes in sperm motility allowing the cell to navigate the hurdles of the female reproductive tract and successfully to locate the egg. Brenker and colleagues show that CatSper is (directly) activated by a diverse range of small organic molecules that are reported to evoke chemotaxis in human spermatozoa, suggesting that CatSper may function as a polymodal, chemosensory calcium channel. Additionally, they provide strong evidence that calcium entry into the spermatozoon does not employ specific, G protein-coupled odorant receptors or activation of trans-membrane adenylate cyclase and is not induced by cyclic nucleotides. The human spermatozoon is a remarkable cell. It is characterised by extremely small size, absence of most organelles, a lack of transcription or translation (DNA is tightly condensed and almost crystalline), extreme polarity and rapid motility. These unusual characteristics have presented great challenges to the application of traditional methods of physiology, cell and molecular biology, such as imaging, electrophysiology, transfection and analysis of gene/protein expression patterns. Consequently, progress in understanding the function of the normal spermatozoon has been painfully slow. However, recently there has been remarkable progress in the understanding of one aspect—sperm motility—largely through developments in technology: patch clamping (Lishko et al, 2010), imaging (Publicover et al, 2007) and the rudimentary synergy of mathematics/physics with sperm biology (systems biology of sperm) (Kirkman-Brown and Smith, 2011). A primary example is the role of Ca in regulating the activity of the flagellum (Darszon et al, 2011). Central to this has been the discovery of sperm-specific CatSper channels (cation channel of sperm), which facilitate the entry of Ca necessary for rapid changes in sperm motility (termed as hyperactivation) (Qi et al, 2007). Two independent studies, utilising patch clamping, previously demonstrated that the induction of Ca entry into human sperm by progesterone is at least partly via CatSper channels (Lishko et al, 2011; Strünker et al, 2011). The study presented in this issue (Brenker et al, 2012) takes these developments much further, potentially unravelling several signalling ‘knots’ for sperm biologists. Brenker et al show that CatSper is (directly) activated by a diverse range of small organic molecules including odorants (e.g., cyclamal and bourgeonal) that are reported to evoke chemotaxis in human spermatozoa (Figure 1A). Thus, CatSper may function as a polymodal, chemosensory Ca channel in the female tract. A significant consequence of CatSper’s promiscuity is that interpretation of drug effects on sperm [Ca ]i, particularly where high concentrations are used, must be undertaken with caution. Additionally, they provide strong evidence that odorants do not elevate sperm [Ca ]i in a manner equivalent to that in nasal olfactory receptors (via specific, G protein-coupled odorant receptors and consequent activation of trans-membrane adenylate cyclase; tmAC). A well-established tenet in the reproductive literature is the functional role of tmAC in sperm. Brenker and colleagues show that tmAC in human sperm has no detectable effect on sperm [cAMP], soluble adenylate cyclase activated by calcium and HCO3 being critical. In fact, their data argue persuasively that the tmAC pathway does not functionally operate in human spermatozoa. Finally, they show that the increase in human sperm [Ca ]i induced by membranepermeant cAMP and cGMP analogues reflects an action of these compounds at the extracellular face of the CatSper channel. This surprising observation explains why more direct approaches to elevating cAMP (e.g., via example photorelease of cAMP) fail to raise [Ca ]i in human spermatozoa. The failure of cyclic nucleotides to activate Ca channels in human sperm contrasts with observations in sea urchin sperm (a key model in research on sperm physiology) and bovine sperm, providing further evidence for the existence of important physiological differences between sperm of different species. Thought provoking and challenging work always generates new questions. For instance, within the female tract the sperm is likely to be subject to a ‘barrage’ of signals from cell interactions and mobile factors, which provide cues and information to the sperm. If many of these stimuli activate CatSper, causing Ca flux into the flagellum (Figure 1B) rather than acting through their ‘own’ receptor, how does the cell generate appropriate responses? Additionally, since humans do not synchronise ovulation with mating, the sperm cell may have to reside in the female tract for days to increase the chances of fertilising an oocyte—probably requiring a period of quiescence. How does the cell ‘ignore’ the ability of small molecules directly to activate CatSper-mediated Ca influx? One possibility is that the downstream recruitment of stored Ca propagates and amplifies the signal and that regulation of this process adds flexibility to CatSper-mediated signalling (Figure 1C). The EMBO Journal (2012) 31, 1624–1626 | & 2012 European Molecular Biology Organization |All Rights Reserved 0261-4189/12 www.embojournal.org