Model Theory and Entailment Rules for RDF Containers, Collections and Reification
نویسندگان
چکیده
An RDF graph is, at its core, just a set of statements consisting of subjects, predicates and objects. Nevertheless, since its inception practitioners have asked for richer data structures such as containers (for open lists, sets and bags), collections (for closed lists) and reification (for quoting and provenance). Though this desire has been addressed in the RDF primer and RDF Schema specification, they are explicitely ignored in its model theory. In this paper we formalize the intuitive semantics (as suggested by the RDF primer, the RDF Schema and RDF semantics specifications) of these compound data structures by two orthogonal extensions of the RDFS model theory (RDFCC for RDF containers and collections, and RDFR for RDF reification). Second, we give a set of entailment rules that is sound and complete for the RDFCC and RDFR model theories. We show that complexity of RDFCC and RDFR entailment remains the same as that of simple RDF entailment.
منابع مشابه
RDF Model Theory
This is a specification of a model-theoretic semantics for RDF and RDFS, and some basic results on entailment. It does not cover reification or special meanings associated with the use of RDF containers. This document was written with the intention of providing a precise semantic theory for RDF and RDFS, and to sharpen the notions of consequence and inference in RDF. It reflects the current und...
متن کاملRDF M&S revisited: From Reification to Nesting, from Containers to Lists, from Dialect to pure XML
The basic result presented is the following: with two assumptions about the intentions behind the RDF model, it can be shown that the RDF model and a model allowing for nested triples and lists of resources and triples, can be mapped to one another (in both directions). This allows to establish a close link between the RDF model and extended models previously suggested (SlimRDF [3], XRDF [4]). ...
متن کاملRDF Model Theory
This is a specification of a model-theoretic semantics for RDF and RDFS, and some basic results on entailment. It does not cover reification or special meanings associated with the use of RDF containers. This document was written with the intention of providing a precise semantic theory for RDF and RDFS, and to sharpen the notions of consequence and inference in RDF. It reflects the current und...
متن کاملCombining RDF and Part of OWL with Rules: Semantics, Decidability, Complexity
This paper extends the model theory of RDF with rules, placing an emphasis on integration with OWL and decidability of entailment. We start from an abstract syntax that views a rule as a pair of rule graphs which generalize RDF graphs by also allowing rule variables in subject, predicate and object positions. We include RDFS as well as a decidable part of OWL that weakens D-entailment and OWL F...
متن کاملRDF model revisited – or: how to make the most out of Reifications and Containers
The basic result presented is the following: with two (hopefully) reasonable assumptions about the intentions behind RDF model, it can be shown that the RDF model and a model allowing for nested triple and lists of resources and triples, can be mapped to one another (in both directions). This allows to establish a close link between the RDF model and “extended” models recently suggested (SlimRD...
متن کامل