Collective belief models for representing consensus and divergence in communities of Bayesian decision-makers
نویسنده
چکیده
OF DISSERTATION Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Computer Science The University of New Mexico Albuquerque, New Mexico
منابع مشابه
Enabling rational democratic decision-making with collective belief models and game theoretic analysis
We introduce a new approach to aggregating the beliefs and preferences of many individuals to form models for democratic decision-making. Traditional social choice functions used to aggregate beliefs and preferences attempt to find a single consensus model, but produce inconsistent results when a stalemate between opposing opinions occurs. Our approach combines the probabilistic beliefs of many...
متن کاملبررسی تأثیر برخی شاخصهای کیفیت آب زیرزمینی بر بیابانزایی اراضی دشت سگزی اصفهان با استفاده از Bayesian Belief Networks
This paper aimed to assess the severity of desertification in Segzi plain located in the eastern part of Isfahan city, focusing on groundwater quality criteria used in MEDALUS model. Bayesian Belief networks (BBNs) were also used to convert MEDALUS model into a predictive, cause and effects model. Different techniques such as Kriging and IDW were applied to water quality data of 12 groundwater ...
متن کاملAgreeing to Disagree: Leveraging Consensus and Divergence in Bayesian Belief Aggregation
We present a new approach for combining the beliefs of many individuals using graphical models. Existing Bayesian belief aggregation methods break several theoretical assumptions for Bayesian reasoning. More practically, existing opinion pool functions that compute a single value to represent the belief of all contributors do not represent reality well, especially in cases where there are many ...
متن کاملProject Portfolio Risk Response Selection Using Bayesian Belief Networks
Risk identification, impact assessment, and response planning constitute three building blocks of project risk management. Correspondingly, three types of interactions could be envisioned between risks, between impacts of several risks on a portfolio component, and between several responses. While the interdependency of risks is a well-recognized issue, the other two types of interactions remai...
متن کاملConfusions over Time: An Interpretable Bayesian Model to Characterize Trends in Decision Making
We propose Confusions over Time (CoT), a novel generative framework which facilitates a multi-granular analysis of the decision making process. The CoT not only models the confusions or error properties of individual decision makers and their evolution over time, but also allows us to obtain diagnostic insights into the collective decision making process in an interpretable manner. To this end,...
متن کامل