School accountability: can we reward schools and avoid pupil selection?
نویسندگان
چکیده
School Accountability: Can We Reward Schools and Avoid Pupil Selection? School accountability schemes require measures of school performance, and these measures are in practice often based on pupil test scores. It is well-known that insufficiently correcting these test scores for pupil characteristics may provide incentives for inefficient pupil selection. We show that the trade-off between reward and pupil selection is not only a matter of sufficient information. A school accountability scheme that rewards school performance will create incentives for pupil selection, even under perfect information, unless the educational production function satisfies an (unrealistic) separability assumption. We propose different compromise solutions and discuss the resulting incentives in theory. The empirical relevance of our analysis – i.e., the rejection of the separability assumption and the magnitude of the incentives in the different compromise solutions – is illustrated with Flemish data. JEL Classification: H52, I22, I24
منابع مشابه
Pupil composition and accountability: An analysis in English primary schools
This paper examines the role of social class and prior achievement composition effects on pupils’ progress and the judgements made about school performance. It finds that there are small but significant compositional effects on pupil progress raising questions about how pupils can best be allocated to schools. Comparisons between the official contextual value addedmodel and one that includes co...
متن کاملEe Dp 1 School a S and T And's Ed
In this paper, we study a high profile case – the introduction of academy schools into the English secondary school sector ‐ that has allowed schools to gain more autonomy and flexible governance by changing their school structure. We consider the impact of an academy school conversion on their pupil intake and pupil performance and possible external effects working through cha...
متن کاملDepartment of Quantitative Social Science Can school competition improve standards? The case of faith schools in England
This paper measures the extent to which the presence of religious state-funded secondary schools in England impacts on the educational experiences of pupils who attend neighbouring schools, whether through school effort induced by competition or changes in peer groups induced by sorting. National administrative data is used to estimate pupil test score growth models between the ages of 11 and 1...
متن کاملNber Working Paper Series beyond Incentives: Do Schools Use Accountability Rewards Productively?
"Accountability mandates" -the explicit linking of school funding, resources, and autonomy to student performance on standardized exams -have proliferated in the last 10 years. In this paper, we examine California's accountability system, which for several years financially rewarded schools based on a deterministic function of test scores. The sharp discontinuity in the assignment rule -schools...
متن کاملDepartment of Quantitative Social Science How should we treat under-performing schools? A regression discontinuity analysis of school inspections in England
School inspections are an important part of the accountability framework for education in England. In this paper we use a panel of schools to evaluate the effect of a school failing its inspection. We collect a decade’s worth of data on how schools are judged across a very large range of subcriteria, alongside an overall judgement of effectiveness. We use this data within a fuzzy regression dis...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Social Choice and Welfare
دوره 46 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2016