Machismo, Misogyny, and Homophobia in a Male Athletic Subculture: a Participant-Observation Study of Deviant Rituals in Collegiate Rugby

Sociological literature focusing on athletic subcultures is abundant; however, little exists that specifically addresses the deviant conduct inherent within these enclaves. Save a few select studies, this is especially true of male collegiate rugby in the United States. Collegiate rugby in the United States is considered by many to be an emerging sport; as such, little is known about the deviant conduct, both criminal and non-criminal, that is inherent within the subculture. Utilizing participant and non-participant observation over the course of several years, this study explores the ritualistic deviant conduct within the male collegiate rugby subculture. The behavior is framed in terms of a functional group phenomenon that appears to be largely perpetuated by the notions of homophobia, machismo, and misogyny. Variations of social learning theories are discussed as possible frameworks by which to examine this unique behavior in future analyses. Kenneth B. Muir and Trina Seitz (2004) "Machismo, Misogyny, and Homophobia in a Male Athletic Subculture: a Participant-Observation Study of Deviant Rituals in Collegiate Rugby" Deviant Behavior #25 pp.303-327 Version of Record Available @ (DOI: 10.1080=01639620490267294) Machismo, Misogyny, and Homophobia in a male Athletic Subculture: a Participant-Observation Study of Deviant Rituals in Collegiate Rugby Kenneth B. Muir and Trina Seitz Appalachian State University, Boone, North Carolina, USA Sociological literature focusing on athletic subcultures is abundant; however, little exists that specifically addresses the deviant conduct inherent within these enclaves. Save a few select studies, this is especially true of male collegiate rugby in the United States. Collegiate rugby in the United States is considered by many to be an emerging sport; as such, little is known about the deviant conduct, both criminal and non-criminal, that is inherent within the subculture. Utilizing participant and non-participant observation over the course of several years, this study explores the ritualistic deviant conduct within the male collegiate rugby subculture. The behavior is framed in terms of a functional group phenomenon that appears to be largely perpetuated by the notions of homophobia, machismo, and misogyny. Variations of social learning theories are discussed as possible frameworks by which to examine this unique behavior in future analyses. In the early 1980s a northeast collegiate men’s rugby team was expelled from campus by its university for what one team member recalled was simply a ‘‘a harmless prank.’’ While suspension of university clubs, athletic or otherwise, is not particularly newsworthy, this club had executed a gruesome prank for its annual alumni game. The evening before the game, several team members broke into one of the university’s medical school buildings and stole a cadaver. The next day the rugby players dressed the cadaver in a team uniform and seated it in a lounge chair along the sidelines far from where living spectators normally watched the team play. The body remained where it was placed throughout the day with only a few of the rugby players and spectators aware of its ‘‘condition.’’ It wasn’t until after the game that university officials learned of the presence of the dead body at the school-sanctioned event. School officials immediately began the process of expelling the responsible team members and the club as a university-recognized entity. In recent years a great deal of attention has been focused on the criminal and non-criminal conduct of athletes in mainstream professional sports such as football, baseball, and basketball. Collegiate athletics also have come under the watchful gaze of the media and others, but owing to state and federal confidentiality laws, many criminal or deviant acts often go unreported when committed on campus property. Overall, significant research has been generated that addresses both athletic deviance as a cultural artifact of a given society and the role that sport plays in male sex-role socialization (Curry 1991; Hughes and Coakley 1991; Kane and Disch 1993; Messner 1987). Still, relatively little has been written with respect to the deviant subcultures within The team remained on suspension for approximately five years to ensure, according to university officials, that all team members even peripherally involved in the caper would have graduated before the school allowed the club to resume activities. As is the case with many ‘‘pranks’’ of this sort, the expulsion earned the team a certain notoriety in the rugby community and several legends of the event remain, including the particularly onerous legend of some team members kicking and throwing the corpse’s severed head around the field after the game had ended. collegiate sports, particularly men’s collegiate rugby. Notable exceptions include the work of Donnelly and Young (1985), Sheard and Dunning (1973), Nelson (1994), Wheatley (1988), and Schacht (1994). The deviant acts committed within the collegiate rugby subculture are ritualistic in nature. The behaviors exhibited by these athletes appear to be learned once they have gained entry into the subculture, and are reminiscent of fraternity initiation rites or other similar degradation ceremonies (see Garfinkel 1956; Jones 2000). In addition, these activities are almost exclusively a group phenomenon; the extant literature indicates that these athletes rarely commit or participate in these deviant acts independent of their rugby subculture. These behaviors may range from rather benign activities, such as the boisterous singing of sexually explicit songs and physical horseplay, to more serious conduct involving binge drinking, vandalizing public property, the infliction of injury, and indecent exposure (Sheard and Dunning 1973). Finally, much of the deviance committed by those in the rugby subculture is often perceived as temporary or short-lived behavior. While the transitory nature of the deviant behavior may not be noteworthy to the participants, this does not obviate the sociological importance of examining the behavior and the concomitant reactions to the deviance. Prior research suggests that the concepts of homophobia, misogyny, and machismo are salient ideologies embedded within male collegiate athletic subcultures (Curry 1991; Dundes and Stein 1985; Dunning 1986; Wheatley 1988; Whitson 1990). Regardless of the severity of the deviant activities, nearly all are driven and perpetuated by these notions that function to reaffirm the importance of masculinity as a prerequisite for participating in the sport. In a radical feminist critique, Lynskyj (1990) noted that the male athletic ethos is the embodiment of traditional values of masculinity, and the behaviors exhibited within these male-dominated subcultures serve to rationalize sexual differentiation and heterosexual male superiority. This study is a heuristic, descriptive endeavor that explores a variety of deviant behaviors committed by male collegiate rugby players within the context of their athletic subculture. The notions of homophobia, misogyny, and machismo are presented as the ideological catalysts that guide a majority of these ritualized performances. While the athletes themselves largely perceive their deviant conduct as ephemeral, the behaviors nevertheless have crucial manifest and latent functions for the group and its individual members. Variations of social learning theory also are presented and discussed, as they may prove viable theoretical frameworks for understanding the emergence of new and differing forms of deviant behavior within the institution of sport.