Crossmodal Double Dissociations Between ‘What’ and ‘Where’
نویسندگان
چکیده
Double dissociations are typically used to examine the modularity of the brain, and its effect on behaviour. This double dissociation method has typically been used within one modality. Tresch, Sinnamon & Seamon [1] found double dissociations in participants’ ability to recognize the form or location of an object. We adapted the paradigm of Tresch et al. to become a crossmodal task. In Experiment 1, participants felt or saw random objects and determined whether the two objects presented within a modality were the same or different. We found that double dissociations of object recognition do not exist crossmodally. In Experiment 2, the same paradigm was utilized, but all stimuli were presented haptically. If the double dissociation effect exists, this would support the evidence from previous studies of crossmodal perceptual load. The implications will be discussed further.
منابع مشابه
Connectionist Dissociations, Confounding Factors and Modularity
Although much has been written on this subject, there still seems to be considerable confusion in the literature concerning dissociations, double dissociations and what they really mean, especially when connectionist or neural network models are involved. In this paper I attempt to clarify matters by looking at the subject from the point of view of patterns of learning rates in neural network m...
متن کاملSimilarity and categorisation: getting dissociations in perspective
Dissociations between similarity and categorization have constituted critical counter-evidence to the view that categorization is similarity-based. However, there have been difficulties in replicating such dissociations. This paper reports three experiments. The first provides evidence of a double dissociation between similarity and categorization. The second and third show that by asking parti...
متن کاملFalse categories in cognition: the Not-the-Liver fallacy.
This paper reports on an increasingly frequent error committed in cognition research that at best slows progress, and at worse leads to self-perpetuating false claims and misguided research. The error involves how we identify meaningful processes and categories on the basis of data. Examples are given from three areas of cognition: (1) memory, where the misconception has fueled the popular impl...
متن کاملDiscussion Interpreting Double Dissociations in Connectionist Networks
A common motivation for studying the cognitive impairments of brain-damaged patients is to determine the “functional architecture” of the cognitive system. But what constitutes a functional architecture? This question used to have a straightforward answer: a set of discrete components with communication pathways among them, with each component assigned a specific function or type of representat...
متن کاملMapping dissociations in verb morphology.
Substantial behavioural and neuropsychological evidence has been amassed to support the dual-route model of morphological processing, which distinguishes between a rule-based system for regular items (walk-walked, call-called) and an associative system for the irregular items (go-went). Some neural-network models attempt to explain the neuropsychological and brain-mapping dissociations in terms...
متن کامل