Pharmacokinetics of sulphadoxine and trimethoprim and tissue irritation caused by two sulphadoxine-trimethoprim containing products after subcutaneous administration in pre-ruminant calves.

The pharmacokinetics of sulphadoxine-trimethoprim was studied in 6 pre-ruminant calves using two different products. Product A, which contained 200 mg sulphadoxine and 40 mg trimethoprim per mL, was administered intravenously or subcutaneously at a dosage of 25 mg sulphadoxine and 5 mg trimethoprim.kg-1 bodyweight. Product B, containing 62.5 mg sulphadoxine and 12.5 mg trimethoprim per mL plus lidocaine (1 mg.mL-1), was given subcutaneously at the same dosage. After intravenous administration of product A the mean time of half-life of elimination phase (t1/2) for sulphadoxine was 12.9 h, steady-state volume of distribution (Vd(ss)) was 0.44 L.kg-1 and clearance was 0.024 L.kg-1.h-1. Respective values for trimethoprim were 1.9 h, 2.0 L.kg-1 and 0.9 L.kg-1.h-1. After subcutaneous administration, the bioavailability of sulphadoxine was 96% and 98% and the time to reach a maximum concentration was 6.3 and 8.0 h for products A and B, respectively. The Cmax for trimethoprim was higher for product A (0.49 microgram.mL-1) than for product B (0.32 microgram.mL-1) (p = 0.014). Slow absorption from the injection site appeared to delay the elimination of trimethoprim after subcutaneous administration when compared to that after intravenous administration: apparent elimination t1/2 for trimethoprim after intravenous administration of product A was 1.9 h compared to 3.9 h and 3.6 h after subcutaneous administration of products A and B, respectively. The difference between intravenous and subcutaneous administrations was statistically significant (p < 0.05). Also the mean residence time was significantly shorter (p < 0.05) after intravenous administration (2.4 h) than that after subcutaneous administration of product A (6.9 h) and B (7.1 h). The bioavailability of trimethoprim was lower than that of sulphadoxine: 76% and 74% for products A and B, respectively. All 6 calves showed pain after subcutaneous administration of product A and the injection sites were warm and showed soft oedematous reactions 5-8 cm in diameter. Three of the calves also showed some pain after subcutaneous administration of product B; the local reactions were less severe. A marked increase was seen in creatine kinase activity after subcutaneous administration of both products. Product A caused a more pronounced increase but the difference was not statistically significant. We suggest 30 mg.kg-1 at 24-h intervals or alternatively 15 mg.kg-1 at 12-h intervals as the minimum dosage of sulphadoxine-trimethoprim combination for pre-ruminant calves. Extravascular routes of administration should be avoided due to marked tissue irritation at the injection site.