Using SAT in QBF
نویسندگان
چکیده
QBF is the problem of deciding the satisfiability of quantified boolean formulae in which variables can be either universally or existentially quantified. QBF generalizes SAT (SAT is QBF under the restriction all variables are existential) and is in practice much harder to solve than SAT. One of the sources of added complexity in QBF arises from the restrictions quantifier nesting places on the variable orderings that can be utilized during backtracking search. In this paper we present a technique for alleviating some of this complexity by utilizing an order unconstrained SAT solver during QBF solving. The innovation of our paper lies in the integration of SAT and QBF. We have developed methods that allow information obtained from each solver to be used to improve the performance of the other. Unlike previous attempts to avoid the ordering constraints imposed by quantifier nesting, our algorithm retains the polynomial space requirements of standard backtracking search. Our empirical results demonstrate that our techniques allow improvements over the current state-of-the-art in QBF solvers.
منابع مشابه
Bounded Model Checking with QBF
Current algorithms for bounded model checking (BMC) use SAT methods for checking satisfiability of Boolean formulas. These BMC methods suffer from a potential memory explosion problem. Methods based on the validity of Quantified Boolean Formulas (QBF) allow an exponentially more succinct representation of the checked formulas, but have not been widely used, because of the lack of an efficient d...
متن کاملUsing Decomposition-Parameters for QBF: Mind the Prefix!
Similar to the satisfiability (SAT) problem, which can be seen to be the archetypical problem for NP, the quantified Boolean formula problem (QBF) is the archetypical problem for PSPACE. Recently, Atserias and Oliva (2014) showed that, unlike for SAT, many of the well-known decompositional parameters (such as treewidth and pathwidth) do not allow efficient algorithms for QBF. The main reason fo...
متن کاملChallenges in the QBF Arena: the SAT'03 Evaluation of QBF Solvers
The implementation of effective reasoning tools for deciding the satisfiability of Quantified Boolean Formulas (QBFs) is an important issue in several research fields such as Formal Verification, Planning, and Reasoning about Knowledge. Several QBF solvers have been implemented in the last few years, most of them extending the well-known Davis, Putnam, Logemann, Loveland procedure (DPLL) for pr...
متن کاملSAT-to-SAT in QBFEval 2016
In this short paper, we describe QBF solvers from the latest QBFEval that were based on the SAT-to-SAT solver. We present the main ideas behind the solvers and discuss their strengths and weaknesses.
متن کاملModel Checking with Quantified Boolean Formulas
Modern symbolic model checking techniques use Binary Decision Diagrams (BDD) and propositional satisfiability (SAT) decision procedures for checking validity and satisfiability of propositional Boolean formulas, which are used to encode sub-problems of symbolic model checking. Usage of propositional formulas imposes a potential exponential memory blow-up on the model checking algorithms due to ...
متن کامل