Fairness and Retaliation: The Economics of Reciprocity
نویسندگان
چکیده
This paper shows that reciprocity has powerful implications for many economic domains. It is an important determinant in the enforcement of contracts and social norms and enhances the possibilities of collective action greatly. Reciprocity may render the provision of explicit incentive inefficient because the incentives may crowd out voluntary co-operation. It strongly limits the effects of competition in markets with incomplete contracts and gives rise to noncompetitive wage differences. Finally, reciprocity it is also a strong force contributing to the existence of incomplete contracts. This paper is part of the MacArthur Foundation Network on Economic Environments and the Evolution of Individual Preferences and Social Norms. Some research reported in this paper has also been funded by the EU-TMR research network ENDEAR (FMRX-CT98-0238). We are very grateful for helpful comments by Alan Krueger, Timothy Taylor and Bradford De Long, as well as by Ken Binmore, Iris Bohnet, Terence Burnham, Colin Camerer, Gary Charness, Jim Cox, Vince Crawford, Armin Falk, Urs Fischbacher, Diego Gambetta, Robert Gibbons, Herbert Gintis, Felix Oberholzer, Larry Samuelson, Rajiv Sethi, Herbert Simon, Vernon Smith and Frans van Winden. We regret that – in view of the very large number of comments we received – we could not do justice to all of them. § Ernst Fehr is Professor of Economics and a Core Member of the MacArthur Foundation Network on Economic Environments and the Evolution of Individual Preferences and Social Norms. Simon Gächter is Professor of Economics. Addresses: University of Zurich, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics, Blümlisalpstrasse 10, CH-8006 Zurich. Email: [email protected] and University of St. Gallen, FEW-HSG, Dufourstrasse 50B, CH-9000 St. Gallen. [email protected].
منابع مشابه
The Economics of Fairness, Reciprocity and Altruism – Experimental Evidence and New Theories
616
متن کاملInformation , fairness , and reciprocity in the best shot game * Jeffrey
Previous best shot experiments document behavior that converges towards the predicted equilibrium despite unequal equilibrium payoffs. Prasnikar and Roth [Quarterly Journal of Economics (1992) 865–888] hypothesize that strategic incentives displace fairness in this game. The current experiment illustrates that providing information differently results in fair outcomes. 2002 Elsevier Science B...
متن کاملPrestige and Dominance as Differential Correlates of Moral Foundations and Its Clinical Implications
Objective: The ways people use for social rank (dominance vs prestige) could explain difference attitude toward five moral foundations. The aim of this study was to investigate the differential relationship between prestige, dominance and moral foundations. Methods: This study conducted with 150 participants who respond to the moral foundation questionnaire and dominance-prestige scale. Multip...
متن کاملNotes and Comments Driving Forces behind Informal Sanctions by Armin Falk,
This paper investigates the driving forces behind informal sanctions in cooperation games and the extent to which theories of fairness and reciprocity capture these forces. We find that cooperators’ punishment is almost exclusively targeted toward the defectors, but the latter also impose a considerable amount of spiteful punishment on the cooperators. However, spiteful punishment vanishes if t...
متن کاملDriving Forces Behind Informal Sanctions
Driving Forces Behind Informal Sanctions This paper investigates the driving forces behind informal sanctions in cooperation games and the extent to which theories of fairness and reciprocity capture these forces. We find that cooperators’ punishment is almost exclusively targeted towards the defectors but the latter also impose a considerable amount of spiteful punishment on the cooperators. H...
متن کامل