Case discussion of an immediate serious reaction to hexavalent vaccine mistaken for anaphylaxis.
نویسندگان
چکیده
Anaphylaxis is rarely associated with vaccination. Clinical presentation may include a variety of non-specific symptoms, making a clinical diagnosis uncertain. Therefore, it is important to distinguish anaphylaxis from other adverse events following immunization (AEFIs), particularly in children, to manage subsequent immunizations where necessary. For administration of additional doses a specialist evaluation is recommended to confirm the diagnosis and consider if re-vaccination is appropriate. A post-event evaluation is based on an in-depth history and skin and in vitro testing to identify specific sensitizations. Applying a standardized AEFI case definition,such as the Brighton Collaboration [1], is also helpful for individual cases as well as pharmacovigilance activities. We describe the case of a child with an immediate reaction to hexavalent vaccine which was mistakenly diagnosed as anaphylaxis. The baby, born in the 34th week, reported no perinatal problems and was breast and artificial milk fed. In good health, he received the first dose of hexavalent vaccine (diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis-poliohepatitis B-haemophilus influenzae type B) at 3 months of age. Upon injection he cried, then he manifested atony, pallor,apnoea and flaccidity.Treated with mouth-to-mouth ventilation, he responded by crying, gasping, ocular reversion and generalized hypotonia. He was then treated with intramuscular epinephrine. On arrival in the emergency department. oxygen was admininistered and he became responsive, reactive and began to breathe normally. He was treated with i.m. methylprednisolone. A transient papular skin rash was observed on the trunk. The vaccination schedule was interrupted and he was referred to a specialized consultation service [2] for further vaccination. Serum analysis showed total IgE = 10 kU l-1 and IgE level to tetanus toxoid <0.10 kUA l-1 (Unicap, Phadia, Sweden). Since there were doubts about the anaphylaxis diagnosis, the following hypotheses were evaluated with international vaccine safety collaborators:
منابع مشابه
Cardiovascular complications and acute ischemic stroke after the treatment with epinephrine in an anaphylactic patient
Anaphylaxis is a serious clinical condition that can affect all ages and many systems (skin, gastrointestinal system, respiratory and cardiovascular systems). There are a few case reports of cardiac and cerebrovascular complications due to the anaphylaxis and/or the treatment with epinephrine. A 69-year-old female patient with known coronary artery disease (CAD), coronary artery bypass graft (C...
متن کاملPassed the Age of Puberty: Organizational Networks as a Way to Get Things Done in the Health Field; Comment on “Evaluating Global Health Partnerships: A Case Study of a Gavi HPV Vaccine Application Process in Uganda”
In this commentary I will demonstrate that the case study of Uganda’s Human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccine application partnership provides an excellent example of widening our lens by evaluating the successful HP vaccine coverage from a network-centric perspective. That implies that the organizational network is seen as the locus of production and that network theories become indispensable to a...
متن کاملPrevalence of anti-gelatin IgE antibodies in people with anaphylaxis after measles-mumps rubella vaccine in the United States.
OBJECTIVE Anaphylaxis after immunization, although rare, is serious and potentially life-threatening. Understanding risk factors for this reaction is therefore important. Gelatin is added to many vaccines as a heat stabilizer. Japanese researchers have demonstrated a strong association between immediate hypersensitivity reactions to measles, mumps, rubella, varicella, and Japanese encephalitis ...
متن کاملSkin Reaction without Systemic Anaphylaxis but Mast Cell-Dependent Immediate-Type Vaccine Peptides Elicit an IgE-Independent Nonmutated Self-Antigen-Derived Cancer
متن کامل
Risk of anaphylaxis after vaccination of children and adolescents.
OBJECTIVE To quantify the risk of anaphylaxis after vaccination of children and adolescents. METHODS The study population consisted of children and adolescents who were enrolled at 4 health maintenance organizations that participated in the Vaccine Safety Datalink Project. For the period 1991-1997, we identified potential cases by searching for occurrences of International Classification of D...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- British journal of clinical pharmacology
دوره 70 6 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2010