Causation and Its Basis in Fundamental Physics
نویسنده
چکیده
ions or fuzzings or coarse-grainings of the object, which are all derivative.) Alternatively, if fundamental reality is something more esoteric like an entangled quantum field or an eleven-dimensional arena inhabited by strings, then there maywell be no parts of fundamental reality that count as an instance of the object, in which case the object is unambiguously derivative. Empirical Analysis and the Metaphysics of Causation Insofar as discussion in this volume will be concerned, it will suffice for us to adopt a single sufficient condition for an existent being derivative. I will specify this sufficient condition in terms of the ontological status of quantities, but it holds of existents generally. A quantity is derivative if its magnitude requires some specification beyond the totality of fundamental reality (and beyond any specification required to locate the quantity in fundamental reality). For example, themass of any corpuscle at any time in the simple theory of classicalmechanics is a quantity that has a determinatemagnitude once we have specified the spatio-temporal location of the corpuscle whosemasswe are considering. By contrast, the kinetic energy of any corpuscle (at any time) is derivative. A corpuscle’s kinetic energy is equal to one-half its mass times its speed squared, mv. In the simple theory of classical mechanics, no fundamental structures suffice for a given corpuscle’s absolute speed; there are only corpuscle speeds relative to other corpuscles. However, if we select an appropriate frame of reference to serve as a universal standard for being at rest, we can say that a corpuscle’s speed is its speed relative to this rest frame. Then, because we have associated a determinate speed with each corpuscle, there will be a well-defined value for each corpuscle’s kinetic energy. The kinetic energy of a corpuscle is an example of a derivative quantity because there is nothing in fundamental reality that corresponds to a unique correct value for the kinetic energy (at the corpuscle’s spatio-temporal location) unless we augment the model with a parameter that doesn’t correspond to anything in fundamental reality, namely this stipulation of what counts as being at rest. Whenever a parameter used for describing reality does not have a unique correct assignment given how fundamental reality is structured, let us say that it is fundamentally arbitrary. A choice of rest is one example of a fundamentally arbitrary parameter. More generally, coordinate systems and so-called gauge degrees of freedom are fundamentally arbitrary. Fundamental reality might make some coordinate systems more convenient than others for characterizing the distribution of matter, but fundamental reality itself is independent of our conventions for assigning labels to points of space-time. Any quantity that is coordinatedependent is derivative. By convention, we can adopt the policy that the fundamentally arbitrary specification needed to locate a region in space-time (orwhatever space is the container of fundamental material stuff) does not by itself make the contents of that region derivative. The locating information should instead be interpreted as merely defining the component of fundamental reality under consideration. Imagine two solid blocks in an otherwise empty portion of space, each composed of massive corpuscles bound together by short-range forces. Fig. . provides two different characterizations of the very same fundamental arrangement of corpuscles that constitute the two blocks. By choosing a rest frame, one bestows on each corpuscle a well-defined (non-relational) velocity. The total kinetic Causation and Its Basis in Fundamental Physics
منابع مشابه
The Physical Foundations of Causation
I sketch an account of causation, showing how several of the main features of causation—asymmetry, transitivity, and necessitation (and sometimes probability-raising)— arise from the combination of fundamental dynamical laws and a special constraint on the structure of matter in the past. The necessitation and transitivity of causation are grounded in the fundamental physics, but the causal asy...
متن کاملA Relic of a Bygone Age? Causation, Time Symmetry and the Directionality Argument∗
Bertrand Russell famously argued that causation is not part of the fundamental physical description of the world, describing the notion of cause as “a relic of a bygone age” (Russell, 1913, p. 1). This paper assesses one of Russell’s arguments for this conclusion: the ‘Directionality Argument’, which holds that the time symmetry of fundamental physics is inconsistent with the time asymmetry of ...
متن کاملCausation, physics, and fit
Our ordinary causal concept seems to fit poorly with how our best physics describes the world. We think of causation as a time-asymmetric dependence relation between relatively local events. Yet fundamental physics describes the world in terms of dynamical laws that are, possible small exceptions aside, time symmetric and that relate global time slices. My goal in this paper is to show why we a...
متن کاملGrounding in the image of causation
Koko is merely non-fundamental. She is a gorilla, and like all biological organisms, she is presumably dependent on the physical. Perhaps the fundamental entities are spacetime with certain physical fields. However exactly that story goes, it seems clear that if and when final physics is done, Koko the gorilla won’t be part of that story. Rather she must somehow be understood as grounded in spa...
متن کاملPhilosophy of causation : blind alleys exposed ; promising directions highlighted
Contemporary philosophical work on causation is a tangled mess of disparate aims, approaches, and accounts. Best to cut through it by means of ruthless but, hopefully, sensible judgments. The ones that follow are designed to sketch the most fruitful avenues for future work. Contemporary philosophical work on causation is a tangled mess of disparate aims, approaches, and accounts. Best to cut th...
متن کامل