Health Care Utilization in Homeless People: Translating Research into Policy and Practice
نویسندگان
چکیده
Homelessness is a major problem across North America: Approximately 3 million Americans have experienced homelessness within the last year, and parents accompanied by children account for about one-fifth of the U.S homeless population. Homeless people suffer from high rates of illness and frequently encounter barriers to accessing care. Comprehensive information on health care utilization for homeless people will help to guide the development of health policy, however, these data have not been attainable through administrative databases in the U.S., because only one-third of the homeless have Medicaid and more than half are uninsured. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) has funded investigatorinitiated research projects for promoting developments related to Translating Research into Policy and Practice. This research study describes and summarizes the background, objectives, methods, research findings and implications for policy and practice from an AHRQ grant entitled “Health Care Utilization in Homeless People” (1 R01 HS04129-01), Stephen W. Hwang, M.D., M.P.H., Principal Investigator, St. Michael‟s Hospital, University of Toronto. The aims and primary objectives of this study were as follows: 1) To enroll a representative sample of homeless men, women, and families to obtain baseline data on these individuals, including demographic characteristics, history of homelessness, physical and mental health status, health conditions, usual source of health care, mental health problems, alcohol and drug problems, health beliefs, social supports, self-reported health care utilization, unmet needs for health care, and self-reported barriers to accessing health care; 2) To precisely quantify these homeless individuals‟ total and annualized health care utilization (office-based visits, emergency department visits and hospitalizations) and health care costs over a 4-5 year (2004 2009) follow-up period within a system of universal health insurance; 3) To compare the intensity of health care utilization among homeless individuals in the general population of Toronto; 4) To identify individual characteristics that are predictive of high levels of health care utilization among the population; 4) To determine whether the use of office-based services by homeless people is associated with a likelihood of emergency department visits and/or hospitalization, after adjustment for baseline characteristics. The study was conducted in Toronto, Ontario, where there is both a large homeless population and comprehensive administrative databases that capture the delivery of all health services for every resident. The study enrolled a random sample of 1,190 homeless individuals in Toronto, Canada, in 2004-2005. Sampling was stratified by sex and family status, resulting in the enrollment of 603 single men, 303 single women, and 284 heads of families (plus 421 children in these 284 families). Homeless participants were matched 1:1 to low income controls from the general population based on year of birth and sex. Data for the control group were obtained from the Registered Persons Database (RPDB) which includes all persons in Toronto, Ontario. The research team constructed a survey instrument that focused on factors likely to be associated with future health care utilization. These factors included demographic characteristics, history of
منابع مشابه
Translating Evidence into Healthcare Policy and Practice: Single Versus Multi-Faceted Implementation Strategies – Is There a Simple Answer to a Complex Question?
How best to achieve the translation of research evidence into routine policy and practice remains an enduring challenge in health systems across the world. The complexities associated with changing behaviour at an individual, team, organizational and system level have led many academics to conclude that tailored, multifaceted strategies provide the most effective approach to knowledge translati...
متن کاملIt Is Not That Simple nor Compelling!; Comment on “Translating Evidence Into Healthcare Policy and Practice: Single Versus Multi-faceted Implementation Strategies – Is There a Simple Answer to a Complex Question?”
Healthcare decisions are often made under pressure, with varying levels of information in a changing clinical context. With limited resources and a focus on improving patient outcomes, healthcare managers and health professionals strive to implement both clinical and cost-effective care. However, the gap between research evidence and health policy/clinical practice persists despite our best eff...
متن کاملIntegrated care for homeless people--sharing knowledge and experience in practice, education and research: results of the networking efforts to find homeless health workers.
Over the last dozen years, as doctors for homeless people in Pittsburgh, USA and Amsterdam, the Netherlands, we have been networking internationally and travelled the streets to find social and medical workers who bring care to homeless people. We felt the need to reach out on the streets to meet homeless people and their problems, and to reach into mainstream services, academic centres and res...
متن کامل“Horses for Courses”; Comment on “Translating Evidence Into Healthcare Policy and Practice: Single Versus Multi-Faceted Implementation Strategies – Is There a Simple Answer to a Complex Question?”
This commentary considers the vexed question of whether or not we should be spending time and resources on using multifaceted interventions to undertake implementation of evidence in healthcare. A review of systematic reviews has suggested that simple interventions may be just as effective as those taking a multifaceted approach. Taking cognisance of the Promoting Action on Research Implementat...
متن کاملDisease Control Priorities Third Edition: Time to Put a Theory of Change Into Practice; Comment on “Disease Control Priorities Third Edition Is Published: A Theory of Change Is Needed for Translating Evidence to Health Policy”
The Disease Control Priorities program (DCP) has pioneered the use of economic evidence in health. The theory of change (ToC) put forward by Norheim is a further welcome and necessary step towards translating DCP evidence into better priority setting in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). We also agree that institutionalising evidence for informed priority-setting processes is crucial. Un...
متن کامل