Quality-adjusted life-year as a surgical outcome measure: a primer for plastic surgeons.
نویسندگان
چکیده
Historically, surgical outcomes have been measured by rates of mortality and morbidity. Fortunately, in plastic surgery, mortality is rarely an issue unless one is practicing in high-risk settings such as burn units or war zones. The improvement of presurgical morbidity, however, is very relevant to our specialty, and great effort should be made to measure it as precisely as possible. The success of plastic surgery interventions has traditionally been measured by beforeand-after photographs in cosmetic surgery, pinch and grip strength and range of motion in hand surgery, percentage of successful flaps or replanted digits in microsurgery, and so forth. Although such outcomes are important, they serve only as proxies for the ultimate goal of optimal physical, mental, and social well-being of the patient. Would one seriously consider a face-lift result satisfactory if the patient required psychiatric support after her operation despite a much improved postoperative photograph? Likewise, would an improvement of 0.5 kg in grip strength after a novel hand procedure be considered successful if the patient was still unable to return to work? What about a meticulously executed flap to reconstruct a through-and-through defect of the mandible in a head and neck cancer where the patient died 6 months later from cancer recurrence?1 Plastic surgeons have recognized for some time now that there can be a discrepancy between their interpretation of a successful surgical outcome and the patient’s expectation. A rapid expansion of outcomes research has occurred over the past two decades in many medical specialties. This has been fueled, at least in part, by the practice of evidence-based medicine. Evidence-based medicine integrates individual clinical expertise with the best available clinical evidence from systematic research.2,3 Outcomes research sets out to measure a patient’s quality of life. The broader term “quality of life” can be defined as “the adequacy of people’s material circumstances and their feelings about these circumstances.”4,5 This encompasses indicators of life satisfaction; personal wealth and possessions; level of safety; level of freedom; spirituality; health perceptions; and physical, psychological, social, and cognitive well-being.4,5 Health-related quality of life, a subcomponent of quality of life, includes all areas specific to health, that is, physical, emotional, psychological, social, cognitive, and role functioning, in addition to abilities, relationships, perceptions, life satisfaction, and well-being. It refers to patients’ appraisals of their current level of functioning and satisfaction with it, compared with what they perceive to be ideal.6,7 There are several different methods available to measure a patient’s health-related quality of life. In the past two decades, a number of validated and reliable scales have been introduced to measure improvement in quality of life of plastic surgical interventions. One particular health-related quality-of-life outcome measure, although infrequently used in plastic surgery, is the quality-adjusted life-year. The quality-adjusted life-year was originally introduced as a measure of health effectiveness for cost-effectiveness analysis to assist decision makers in allocating scarce resources across competing health care programs.8–10 Health care spending in the United States is the highest in the world, averaging $7026 per person per year.11 However, the U.S. health care system ranks 37th among the 191 countries.12 Although nationwide efforts to decrease this unsustainable growth have had limited success so far, this issue will be dealt with sooner From the Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics and the Surgical Outcomes Research Center, McMaster University, and the Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, St. Joseph’s Healthcare. Received for publication July 23, 2009; accepted October 29, 2009. Copyright ©2010 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons
منابع مشابه
A methodological guide to performing a cost-utility study comparing surgical techniques.
BACKGROUND When recommending the adoption of a new surgical intervention as opposed to maintaining an old one, surgeons need to consider the opportunity cost, which is the value of the forgone benefits. To inform these decisions, surgeons can use economic analyses of surgical practices. Unfortunately, economic analyses conducted alongside randomized controlled trials in surgery are rare. OBJE...
متن کاملThe Role of Plastic Surgeons in Advancing Development Global
In September 2015, the international community came together to agree on the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, a plan of action for people, the planet, and prosperity. Ambitious and far-reaching as they are, they are built on three keystones: the elimination of extreme poverty, fighting climate change, and a commitment to fighting injustice and inequality. Critical to the achievement of ...
متن کاملEffect of Multimedia Self-Care Education on Quality of Life in Burn Patients
BACKGROUND Burn injuries can have adverse effects on quality of life of patients and can disturb their physiological, psychological, social and spiritual well-being. This study aimed to investigate the effect of multimedia self-care program on quality of life in burn patients. METHODS This Randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted from November 2015 to December 2016. The samples w...
متن کاملChange in quality of life and cost/utility analysis in open stage-related surgical treatment of elbow stiffness.
The goals of this study were to examine the improvement in quality of life achieved after open surgical treatment of elbow stiffness and to verify the cost/utility ratio of surgery. Thirty-three patients (22 men and 11 women) underwent surgery. The etiologies of elbow stiffness were posttraumatic conditions (n=26), primary osteoarthritis (n=5), and rheumatoid arthritis (n=2). Surgery included 1...
متن کاملMeasuring the Benefits of Healthcare: DALYs and QALYs – Does the Choice of Measure Matter? A Case Study of Two Preventive Interventions
Background The measurement of health benefits is a key issue in health economic evaluations. There is very scarce empirical literature exploring the differences of using quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) or disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) as benefit metrics and their potential impact in decision-making. Methods Two previously published models delivering outputs in QALYs, were adapted...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Plastic and reconstructive surgery
دوره 125 4 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2010