Impact of Hymenoptera venom allergy and the effects of specific venom immunotherapy on mast cell metabolites in sensitized children.
نویسندگان
چکیده
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE Mast cells (MC) are effector cells during severe systemic reactions (SR) to Hymenoptera stings. Venom specific immunotherapy (VIT) is the treatment of choice for prevention of SR to stings. Tryptase and prostaglandin D₂ metabolites (PGD₂) are the markers of MC activation. The study design was to 1. compare baseline values of serum tryptase concentration (BST) and PGD₂ metabolites in children with/without venom sensitization, 2. to evaluate an influence of rush VIT on MC markers in treated children. MATERIALS AND METHODS Sensitized group: 25 children with SR to Hymenoptera sting. CONTROL GROUP 19 healthy children. Active treatment: 5-day-rush-VIT. BST was evaluated by ImmunoCAP, PGD₂ metabolites in blood and urine by GC-NICI-MS. RESULTS The baseline blood levels of MC markers were significantly higher, while urinary concentration of 9α,11β-PGF₂ was significantly lower in the whole group of venom-sensitized children compared to controls. Severity of SR showed negative correlation with urinary PGD₂ metabolites, while positive with plasma 9α,11β-PGF₂ and BST concentration The highest sensitivity was obtained for plasma 9α,11β-PGF₂ whereas the highest specificity for urinary PGD-M. CONCLUSIONS In children with IgE-mediated SR to Hymenoptera stings, elevation of baseline values of PGD₂ metabolites in blood is accompanied by decreased excretion of its urinary metabolites. Assessment of stable PGD₂ metabolites might serve as an independent MC marker to identify allergic children. There is an association between urinary PGD₂ metabolites and severity of the SR to Hymenoptera stings.
منابع مشابه
Diagnostics in Hymenoptera venom allergy: current concepts and developments with special focus on molecular allergy diagnostics
BACKGROUND The high rate of asymptomatic sensitization to Hymenoptera venom, difficulty in correctly identifying Hymenoptera and loss of sensitization over time make an accurate diagnosis of Hymenoptera venom allergy challenging. Although routine diagnostic tests encompassing skin tests and the detection of venom-specific IgE antibodies with whole venom preparations are reliable, they offer ins...
متن کاملSingle venom-based immunotherapy effectively protects patients with double positive tests to honey bee and Vespula venom
BACKGROUND Referring to individuals with reactivity to honey bee and Vespula venom in diagnostic tests, the umbrella terms "double sensitization" or "double positivity" cover patients with true clinical double allergy and those allergic to a single venom with asymptomatic sensitization to the other. There is no international consensus on whether immunotherapy regimens should generally include b...
متن کاملAge-dependent sting recurrence and outcome in immunotherapy-treated children with anaphylaxis to Hymenoptera venom.
BACKGROUND Data on outcome of insect venom immunotherapy in children are rare. OBJECTIVE We investigated the rate of sting recurrence and outcome of Hymenoptera venom anaphylaxis in children of different age groups treated with immunotherapy. METHODS Data from children consecutively referred for anaphylaxis to Hymenoptera venom were collected using a standardized questionnaire. RESULTS Du...
متن کاملSerum tryptase level is a better predictor of systemic side effects than prostaglandin D2 metabolites during venom immunotherapy in children.
OBJECTIVES We performed a prospective study to analyze mast cell mediators as predictors of systemic adverse reactions during rush venom-specific immunotherapy (VIT) in children. PATIENTS AND METHODS Nineteen children aged 5-17 years received VIT with Venomenhal (HALAllergy). We analyzed serum tryptase (CAP, Phadia), plasma prostaglandin (PG) D2 metabolites (9alpha, 11beta-PGF2), and urine PG...
متن کاملAllergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology
Background: Referring to individuals with reactivity to honey bee and Vespula venom in diagnostic tests, the umbrella terms “double sensitization” or “double positivity” cover patients with true clinical double allergy and those allergic to a single venom with asymptomatic sensitization to the other. There is no international consensus on whether immunotherapy regimens should generally include ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Annals of agricultural and environmental medicine : AAEM
دوره 21 2 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2014