Strategic voting in established and new democracies: Ticket splitting in mixed-member electoral systems
نویسندگان
چکیده
Using Cox’s ’SF-ratio’ (the ratio of the vote won by the ’second loser’ to that of the ’first loser’), we examine strategic voting in mixed-member electoral systems in ten countries and a total of 35 elections. The SF-ratio is a useful indicator of strategic defection from less competitive to more competitive electoral options that is comparable across very diverse country cases. Under conditions of a Duvergerian equilibrium, where there is substantial information indicating which candidate is likely to end up the top challenger to the frontrunner, the SF-ratio for a district will tend toward zero. In contrast, in cases where voters either are unwilling or unable to cast strategic ballots, SF-ratios will tend to be higher. Our findings show substantial evidence of strategic voting in established democracies, particularly in districts with closer races, but little evidence of strategic voting in new democracies with poorly institutionalized party systems. 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. There have been a number of studies of ticket splitting under two-ballot mixed-member electoral systems. In many ways, such systems offer an ideal arrangement for understanding ‘‘horizontal’’ ticket splitting (see Burden and Helmke’s introductory article). Under these mixedmember systems, voters cast two ballots simultaneously to elect representatives to a single branch of the legislature. They cast one ballot for a candidate in a single member district (SMD) and one for a party in a proportional representation (PR) contest. Because these two votes are cast under different electoral rules, mixed-member systems are also ideal laboratories for examining the sources of split-ticket voting. Scholars have regularly used the difference in aggregate vote totals – usually at the district level – to argue that much of split-ticket voting in mixed-member systems is founded on strategic voting rather than, for example, strategic balancing of different parties to achieve a certain
منابع مشابه
Strategic Ticket Splitting and the Personal Vote in MixedMember Electoral Systems
This article examines ticket splitting in five different mixed-member electoral systems—Germany, New Zealand, Japan, Lithuania, and Russia—and indicates the shortcomings inherent in any analysis of such ticket splitting that does not take into account the presence of the personal vote. We find that the personal vote plays a central part in shaping ticket splitting in all of our cases except for...
متن کامل1 Voter strategies with restricted choice menus
Mixed-member electoral systems require voters simultaneously to cast ballots in single-member districts (SMD) and multimember, proportional representation (PR) constituencies. It may be that not all parties offer candidates in both electoral contexts, however. In this event would-be voters for some parties may find themselves “frustrated” by the restricted choice menu on offer in the SMD, being...
متن کاملTicket-splitting and strategic voting under mixed electoral rules: Evidence from Germany
There is more to strategic voting than simply avoiding wasting one’s vote if one is liberated from the corset of studying voting behavior in plurality systems. Mixed electoral systems provide different voters with diverse incentives to cast a strategic vote.They not only determine the degree of strategic voting, but also the kind of strategies voters employ. Strategic voters employ either a was...
متن کاملMultiparty Split - Ticket Voting Estimation as an Ecological Inference Problem ∗
The estimation of vote splitting in mixed-member electoral systems is a common problem in electoral studies, where the goal of researchers is to estimate individual voter transitions between parties on two different ballots cast simultaneously. Because the ballots are cast separately and secretly, however, voter choice on the two ballots must be recreated from separately tabulated aggregate dat...
متن کاملTwo Step Forward , One Steps Back : Electoral Coordination in the Hungarian Elections of 1998
Electoral coordination refers to the use by political parties of a concerted strategy that makes most effective use of electoral rules to maximize their interests in legislative elections. Coordination requires both strategic thinking and political discipline, however, and in relatively new democracies these conditions may not exist. In this study I examine electoral coordination in the Hungari...
متن کامل