On Mechanizing Proofs within a Complete Proof System for Unity
نویسندگان
چکیده
The solution proposed by Sanders in 14] consists of eliminating the need of the substitution axiom from Unity in order to eliminate the unsoundness problem caused by this axiom in Unity without loss of completeness. Sander's solution is based on the strongest invariant concept and provides theoretical advantages by formally capturing the eeects of the initial conditions on the properties of a program. This solution is less convincing from a practical point of view because it assumes proofs of strongest invariant in the meta-level. In this paper we reconsider this solution showing that the general concept of invariant is suucient to eliminate the substitution axiom and to provide a sound and relatively complete proof system for Unity logic. The advantage of the new solution is that proofs of invariants are mechanized inside the Unity logic itself.
منابع مشابه
The Use of Planning Critics in Mechanizing Inductive Proofs
Proof plans provide a technique for guiding the search for a proof in the context of tactical style reasoning. We propose an extension to this technique in which failure may be exploited in the search for a proof. This extension is based upon the concept of planning critics. In particular we illustrate how proof critics may be used to patch proof plans in the domain of inductive proofs.
متن کاملThe logical structures of theological proofs, with an emphasis on the proof of love to God
This article has no abstract.
متن کاملConstrained Tree Grammars to Pilot Automated Proof by Induction
In this paper, we develop a new approach for mechanizing induction on complex data structures (like bags, sorted lists, trees, powerlists. . . ) by adapting and generalizing works in tree automata with constraints. The key idea of our approach is to compute a tree grammar with constraints which describes the initial model of the given specification. This grammar is used as an induction schema f...
متن کاملPsychological Validity of Schematic Proofs
Schematic proofs are functions which can produce a proof of a proposition for each value of their parameters. A schematic proof can be constructed by abstracting a general pattern of proof from several examples of a family of proofs. In this paper we examine several interesting aspects of the use of schematic proofs in mathematics. Furthermore, we pose several conjectures about the psychologica...
متن کاملGod in Sikhism
The fundamental belief in Sikhism is that God exists not merely as an idea or concept, but as a real entity. God is indescribable, yet knowable and perceivable to anyone who is prepared to dedicate the time and energy to become perceptive to His persona. The Gurus never spoke about proofs of the existence of God. For them, He is too real, and something obvious does not require any logical proof...
متن کامل