For the sake of consistency and fairness: why insurance companies should cover fertility preservation treatment for iatrogenic infertility.
نویسنده
چکیده
There is much debate not only about the morality of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) but also about how they should be classified. Should ART be understood as medical treatment for a disease (infertility) or should they be relegated to boutique medicine where they are seen as elective? How we answer this question affects our thoughts about whether ART should be covered by insurance companies. Those who claim infertility is a medical disease usually advocate that ART be covered by insurance. Conversely, those who believe ART are elective procedures generally oppose insurance coverage, insisting that insurance coverage should be limited to medically necessary treatments. While the debate cannot simply be reduced to whether “real” diseases should be covered by insurance and all other conditions should not, in the minds of many, a strong connection exists between what is considered a disease and what insurance should cover. For the purposes of this chapter, therefore, the belief that medically necessary conditions should be covered by insurance whereas elective conditions should not will serve as the basis of the discussion. Most discussions of ART focus on their use in two circumstances: first, to treat people currently suffering from infertility due to disease (e.g., endometriosis) or unknown cause, and second, and more recently, to provide “insurance” against age-related infertility for women who plan to delay childbearing. Though still a contentious issue, the former – disease-induced infertility – is typically thought to be more deserving of insurance coverage than the latter – age-related infertility – because the cause of infertility is a disease, a “legitimate” medical problem rather than an individual’s action. Indeed, some have argued that insurance should cover treatment for the underlying disease that is causing infertility (e.g., open a blocked fallopian tube) even if they do not think they should cover ART (Gerrity, 2009, Executive Director of the Oncofertility Consortium, Personal conversation). The perceived cause of age-related infertility is, in contrast, not often seen as legitimate
منابع مشابه
Consistency in insurance coverage for iatrogenic conditions resulting from cancer treatment including fertility preservation.
Insurance companies generally cover treatment for iatrogenic conditions that result from cancer treatment, including treatment for conditions that may be considered elective when “naturally” occurring (note that in this article, I am using the word “iatrogenic” to refer only to nonnegligent treatment-induced conditions). One notable exception is fertility preservation for iatrogenic infertility...
متن کاملI-35: Emergency Stimulation for Onco -Fertility Patients
Background Fertility preservation for female cancer patients prior to cancer therapy has emerged as an essential component of comprehensive patient care. In the US, approximately 6% of women diagnosed with invasive cancer between 2007 and 2011 that were under 45 years old. The incidence of cancers in reproductive age women signifies a need for fertility preservation options and this need is inc...
متن کاملI-6: Fertility Preservation in Male Patient with Cancer
Studies suggest that the ability to have biological children is of great importance to many people. The cancer and its treatment often pose a threat to fertility. Rates of permanent infertility and compromised fertility after cancer treatment vary and depend on many factors. Male infertility can result from the disease itself (best documented in patients with testicular cancer and Hodgkin’s lym...
متن کاملPreserving fertility in cancer patients.
F our years ago, Alice Crisci was diagnosed with stage I breast cancer at age 31. She immediately brought up fertility preservation with her oncologist, who told her there was a 50% chance the chemotherapy treatment for breast cancer would leave her infertile. “I knew if they told me there was a 2% chance, I would have still wanted to pursue fertility preservation,” said Crisci. She quickly lea...
متن کاملLegal Aspects of Iatrogenic Multiple Pregnancy
During Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) procedures, the transfer of a single embryo dramatically reduces the rate of multiple pregnancy. Proper information, therefore, should be delivered to patients before embryo transfer. In many countries, regulations limit, according to age of the patient, the number of embryos to be transferred. Selective fetal reduction should not be considered as a...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Cancer treatment and research
دوره 156 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2010