Terminating Tableaux for Modal Logic with Transitive Closure
نویسندگان
چکیده
We present a terminating tableau system for the modal logic K∗. K∗ extends the basic modal logic K with a reflexive transitive closure operator for relations and is a proper fragment of propositional dynamic logic. We investigate two different approaches to achieve termination, namely chain-based blocking and pattern-based blocking. Pattern based-blocking has not been applied to a modal logic with a reflexive transitive closure operator. We have a modular completeness proof that adapts to both termination approaches. Extending completeness arguments for a related description logic, we establish a strengthened soundness property of our calculus that we call straightness. Using this property we are able to prove both verification and refutation soundness.
منابع مشابه
Terminating Tableau Systems for Modal Logic with Equality
The paper presents two terminating tableau systems for hybrid logic with the difference modality. Both systems are based on an abstract treatment of equality. They expand formulas with respect to a congruence closure that is not represented explicitly. The first system employs pattern-based blocking. The second system employs chain-based blocking and covers converse modalities. Both systems can...
متن کاملTerminating Tableau Calculi for Hybrid Logics Extending K
This article builds on work by Bolander and Blackburn [7] on terminating tableau systems for the minimal hybrid logic K. We provide (for the basic uni-modal hybrid language) terminating tableau systems for a number of non-transitive hybrid logics extending K, such as the logic of irreflexive frames, antisymmetric frames, and so on; these systems don’t employ loop-checks. We also provide (for hy...
متن کاملTableaux for multi-modal hybrid logic with binders, transitive relations and relation hierarchies
In a previous paper, a tableau calculus has been presented, which constitute a decision procedure for hybrid logic with the converse and global modalities and a restricted use of the binder. This work extends such a calculus to multi-modal logic with transitive relations and relation inclusion assertions. The separate addition of either transitive relations or relation hierarchies to the consid...
متن کاملCompleteness Proof by Semantic Diagrams for Transitive Closure of Accessibility Relation
We treat the smallest normal modal propositional logic with two modal operators 2 and 2+. While 2 is interpreted in Kripke models by the accessibility relation R, 2+ is interpreted by the transitive closure of R. Intuitively the formula 2+φ means the infinite conjunction 2φ ∧ 22φ ∧ 222φ ∧ · · · . There is a Hilbert style axiomatization of this logic (a characteristic axiom is 2φ ∧ 2+(φ → 2φ) → ...
متن کاملTerminating Tableau Systems for Hybrid Logic with Difference and Converse
This paper contributes to the principled construction of terminating tableau systems for modal logic with nominals and difference modalities [4, 1, 8, 11]. We also consider global and converse modalities and reflexive and transitive relations. Nominals and difference enrich modal logic with equational constraints, and handling these constraints in a terminating tableau system is the main challe...
متن کامل