FROM ENCYCLOPÆDIA BRITANNICA TO WIKIPEDIA Generational differences in the perceived credibility of online encyclopedia information
نویسندگان
چکیده
This study examined the perceived credibility of user-generated (i.e. Wikipedia) versus more expertly provided online encyclopedic information (i.e. Citizendium, and the online version of the Encyclopædia Britannica) across generations. Two large-scale surveys with embedded quasi-experiments were conducted: among 11–18-year-olds living at home and among adults 18 years and older. Results showed that although use of Wikipedia is common, many people (particularly adults) do not truly comprehend how Wikipedia operates in terms of information provision, and that while people trust Wikipedia as an information source, they express doubt about the appropriateness of doing so. A companion quasi-experiment found that both children and adults assess information to be more credible when it originates or appears to originate from Encyclopædia Britannica. In addition, children rated information from Wikipedia to be less believable when they viewed it on Wikipedia’s site than when that same information appeared on either Citizendium’s site or on Encyclopædia Britannica’s site. Indeed, content originating from Wikipedia was perceived by children as least credible when it was shown on a Wikipedia page, yet the most credible when it was shown on the page of Encyclopædia Britannica. The practical and theoretical implications of these results are discussed.
منابع مشابه
Perceived credibility of Internet encyclopedias
A vast amount of information is now available online, produced by a variety of sources with a range of editorial oversight procedures. These range from very centralized information with multiple layers of review, to no oversight at all. Determining which information is credible can pose a real challenge. An experiment was designed to determine whether certain webpage characteristics affect acad...
متن کاملThe Perceived Credibility of Online Encyclopedias Among Children
This study examined young people’s trust of Wikipedia as an information resource. A large scale probability based survey with embedded quasi experiments was conducted with 2,747 children in the U.S. ranging from 11 to 18 years old. Results show that young people find Wikipedia to be fairly credible, but also exhibit an awareness of potential problems with non expert, user generated content in a...
متن کاملDo Experts or Collective Intelligence Write with More Bias? Evidence from Encyclopædia Britannica and Wikipedia
متن کامل
Remodeling Information Networks based on Collective Human Intelligence
Before the advent of Wikipedia, information networks were curated by a small set of subject experts. Thus the links between information nodes were based on their individual understanding of the network. Wikipedia, which is a free-access and free-content Internet encyclopedia, however allows anyone to edit almost all of its articles and thus depends heavily on community participation for creatio...
متن کاملWisdom of the Crowds: Decentralized Knowledge Construction in Wikipedia
Recently, Nature published an article comparing the quality of Wikipedia articles to those of Encyclopedia Britannica (Giles 2005). The article, which gained much public attention, provides evidence for Wikipedia quality, but does not provide an explanation of the underlying source of that quality. Wikipedia, and wikis in general, aggregate information from a large and diverse author-base, wher...
متن کامل