Slate: An Argument-Centered Intelligent Assistant to Human Reasoners

نویسندگان

  • Selmer Bringsjord
  • Andrew Shilliday
  • Konstantine Arkoudas
  • Joshua Taylor
  • Micah Clark
  • Wayne Gray
  • Michael Schoelles
  • Marc Destefano
چکیده

We describe Slate, a logic-based, robust interactive reasoning system that allows human “pilots” to harness an ensemble of intelligent agents in order to construct, test, and express various sorts of natural argumentation. Slate empowers students and professionals in the business of producing argumentation, e.g., mathematicians, logicians, intelligence analysts, designers and producers of standardized reasoning tests. We demonstrate Slate in several examples, describe some distinctive features of the system (e.g., reading and generating natural language, immunizing human reasoners from “logical illusions”), present Slate’s theoretical underpinnings, and note upcoming refinements.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Slate : An Argument - Centered Intelligent Assistant to Professional Reasoners ∗

7 Under the Hood (briefly) 9 8 The Future 9 * With much gratitude, we acknowledge the financial support provided by ARDA that made the development of Slate (v3) possible over a 40 month-long period of intense work in the RAIR Lab.

متن کامل

Establishing an Argument-Based Validity Approach for a Low-Stake Test of Collocational Behavior

Most of the validation studies conducted across varying test application contexts are usually framed within the traditional conceptualization of validity and therefore lack a comprehensive framework to focus on test score interpretations and test score use. This study aimed at developing and validating a collocational behavior test (CBT), drawing on Kane's argument-based approach to validity. F...

متن کامل

Experiments for Assessing Floating Reinstatement in Argument-based Reasoning

Various Artificial Intelligence semantics have been developed to predict when an argument can be accepted, depending on the abstract structure of its defeaters and defenders. These semantics can make conflicting predictions, as in the situation known as floating reinstatement. We argue that the debate about which semantics makes the correct prediction can be informed by the collection of experi...

متن کامل

Behavioral Considerations in Developing Web Information Systems: User-centered Design Agenda

The current paper explores designing a web information retrieval system regarding the searching behavior of users in real and everyday life. Designing an information system that is closely linked to human behavior is equally important for providers and the end users.  From an Information Science point of view, four approaches in designing information retrieval systems were identified as system-...

متن کامل

Health as Human Right; Legal Narrative of “Governance For Health” Logic

The "Legal language" has provided a strong supportive argument for right to health advocacy. In such a way that, human rights rules has been established as the most important globalized political value at the heart of the theory and practice of public health discourse. Its power of enforceability guaranties fair distribution of health resources in each country. At the same time, the right to he...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2008