Cost Implications of Using Unfractionated Heparin or Enoxaparin in Medical Patients at Risk for Venous Thromboembolic Events
نویسندگان
چکیده
ABSTRACT Background. Previous economic studies have compared the cost effectiveness of different heparins used as prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism (VTE) in medical patients at risk. These pharmacoeconomic evaluations have revealed cost benefits of enoxaparin over unfractionated heparin (UFH). However, these modeling studies generally do not use “real-life” hospital data to calculate the actual cost difference from a hospital perspective. Objective. We sought to compare the total cost of care, from a hospital perspective, of thromboprophylaxis with UFH and enoxaparin in patients at risk. Research Design and Methods. Using modified, All-Payer, Severity-Adjusted Diagnosis-Related Groups (M-APS-DRGs), we performed a retrospective analysis of administrative data from 89,584 at-risk patients in 15 U.S. hospitals. Patients were considered for this study if they were in nonsurgical M-APSDRGs in which at least 50% of patients stayed in the hospital for five or more days. Patients receiving UFH and enoxaparin were identified and compared, within the same M-APS-DRGs, based on the total cost of care associated with the various therapies. We also calculated costs at the cost-center level in order to elucidate where the use of inpatient hospital resources differed. Results. Forty-seven M-APS-DRGs (with 10,953 discharged patients receiving UFH and 6,246 receiving enoxaparin) had used both drugs sufficiently for inclusion in the study. Lower costs were observed with enoxaparin than with UFH in 35 M-APS-DRGs (74%). Differences were statistically significant in 17 M-APS-DRGs (36.2%); 15 of those showed lower costs with enoxaparin. The severity-adjusted mean saving per discharge with enoxaparin was $1,002. Overall, length of hospital stay was 0.6 days greater with enoxaparin than with UFH. Conclusion. Enoxaparin was associated with lower total inpatient costs of care than UFH for preventing VTE in hospitalized at-risk patients.
منابع مشابه
Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Two Different Enoxaparin Products in Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism Following Major Obstetric-gynecological Surgeries: An Open-label Randomized Clinical Trial
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) occurs in about 5 percent of patients undergoing major abdominal surgeries. Prophylaxis of VTE is recommended using unfractionated heparin (UF) or low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in high-risk patients. In spite of advantages and confirmed cost-effectiveness of LMWH, high costs of enoxaparin branded preparations limit its use. We aimed to compare the efficacy and...
متن کاملComparison of Efficacy and Safety of Two Different Enoxaparin Products in Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism Following Major Obstetric-gynecological Surgeries: An Open-label Randomized Clinical Trial
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) occurs in about 5 percent of patients undergoing major abdominal surgeries. Prophylaxis of VTE is recommended using unfractionated heparin (UF) or low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in high-risk patients. In spite of advantages and confirmed cost-effectiveness of LMWH, high costs of enoxaparin branded preparations limit its use. We aimed to compare the efficacy and...
متن کاملA cost analysis of fondaparinux versus enoxaparin in total knee arthroplasty.
Several hundred thousand total knee replacement (TKR) surgeries are performed in the United States each year. The American College of Chest Physicians has classified TKR patients in the "highest-risk" category for developing venous thromboembolic events. Recommended prophylactic agents following TKR surgery include unfractionated heparin and low-molecular weight heparins. Fondaparinux is a sele...
متن کاملThe economic impact of enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin for prevention of venous thromboembolism in acute ischemic stroke patients
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common complication after acute ischemic stroke that can be prevented by the use of anticoagulants. Current guidelines from the American College of Chest Physicians recommend that patients with acute ischemic stroke and restricted mobility receive prophylactic low-dose unfractionated heparin or a low-molecular-weight heparin. Results from clinical studies, most...
متن کاملEnoxaparin utilization evaluation in inpatients with or at risk of thromboembolic disorders: A one-year, single-centered, retrospective Study
The aim of this study was evaluation of enoxaparin utilization in hospitalized patients who had received enoxaparin either for prophylaxis or for treatment of thromboembolic disorders. A total of 356 patients were included in this retrospective study and were analyzed for enoxaparin utilization in terms of prescription patterns, treatment strategy, dosing regimen, indications/contraindica...
متن کامل