Accidental Needlestick Exposures linked to the Administration of Local Anesthesia by Healthcare Workers.
نویسندگان
چکیده
To the Editor—The Massachusetts Department of Public Health mandates that all Massachusetts hospitals maintain an active log to track sharps injuries due to the health risks related to such injuries. These logs are used to guide continuous quality improvement activities aimed at preventing sharps injuries. A review of sharps injuries at UMass Memorial Medical Center (UMMMC) in 2013 showed a seemingly high incidence occurring among healthcare workers who were administering local anesthesia. We undertook an investigation of the relative rate of needlesticks associated with local anesthesia administration compared to the rate of all sharps injuries over a 10-year period. A review was performed of all reported sharps injuries at UMMMC recorded in the Employee Health Services log between January 1, 2004 and December 31, 2013, including the setting of the event and the activity performed. Sharps injuries were categorized as 1 of 5 types: local anesthesia needlesticks, insulin needlesticks, other hollow-bore needlesticks (excluding local anesthesia and insulin sticks), suture injuries, and scalpel injuries. Sharps injuries per 1,000 employees were calculated using the total number of employees, residents, and medical students per year. Sharps injury rates per 10,000 inpatient days were also calculated using the total inpatient admissions, ambulatory visits, and emergency department visits per year. We used descriptive statistics, test of trend, and U statistical process control charts to describe the sharps injury incidence over time. There was a statistically significant decrease in overall sharps injuries per 1,000 employees from 2004 to 2013 (P= .003) (Table 1). In contrast, sharps injuries associated with local anesthesia needlesticks showed a statistically significant increasing trend from 2004 to 2013 (P= .017). Other hollowbore needlesticks showed a statistically significant decreasing trend from 2004 to 2013. The incidence of insulin needlesticks, suture injuries, and scalpel injuries showed no significant trend from 2004 to 2013. Comparable trends are shown with calculated rates per 10,000 inpatient days. Accidental sharps injuries put healthcare workers at risk for >20 pathogens, including HIV, hepatitis B, and hepatitis C. In addition to the concern for healthcare workers well-being, exposure management incursa significant cost to healthcare, with cost estimates of well over $100 million annually in the United States. Consequently, continued efforts to identify and eliminate the causes of sharps injuries are essential. Sharps injuries can result from the exchange of sharps between healthcare workers, the placement of sharps in the disposal container, or nonadherence to the sharps injury prevention protocol. Sharps injury can be prevented by eliminating unnecessary sharps use, the use of sharps injury prevention devices, the practice of safer work environments, and continuous training of healthcare workers regarding proper technique and safety. Data from the Massachusetts Department of Public Health have shown an ongoing decline in sharps injuries across all Massachusetts hospitals that correlates with the introduction of these approaches. Practices that have been linked to healthcare worker injuries from hollow-bore needles include not properly recapping the needle, lack of awareness of needle location in relation to oneself, and/or not activating safety mechanisms to cover the tip of the needle. An association between the administration of local anesthesia and sharps injuries has not previously been noted, but it is reasonable to consider that it relates to the procedure used to administer local anesthesia. To administer local anesthesia, the healthcare worker commonly draws up excess local anesthesia in to a syringe, performs an initial injection of local anesthetic, places the needle and syringe down with or without capping the needle, and then reuses the same needle and syringe to administer additional doses of local anesthesia as needed to
منابع مشابه
Risk Factors of Needlestick and Sharps Injuries among Healthcare Workers
Background and Objectives: Exposure to contaminated needlesticks and sharp devices is an important occupational hazard among healthcare workers. The objective of this study was to gain further insight into prevalence and risk factors of needlestick and sharps injuries among healthcare workers. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was carried out among 384 healthcare workers of two hospitals in N...
متن کاملNeedlestick and Sharp Injuries Incidents among Iranian Healthcare Workers: an Updated Survey in Iran
Background and objectives: Needle stick and sharp injuries (NSIs) has remained as a persisting occupational hazard among the healthcare workers. This study aimed to provide updated information on the intensity and potential causes of the problem in Iran, by surveying a sample from major hospitals affiliated with Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Methods: Of 3312 healthcare workers with...
متن کاملManagement of healthcare workers after occupational exposure to hepatitis C virus.
The increasing rate of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in the community means that there is increased risk of occupational exposure for healthcare workers. In metropolitan hospitals in Victoria, we found that 80-150 healthcare workers have occupational exposures from HCV-infected patients annually. As there is a 1.8%-3% risk of transmission of HCV from a needlestick injury, two to five health...
متن کاملIs your office prepared for an accidental needlestick or other unexpected exposure incident?
Recommendations and mandatory guidelines for preventing and managing needlestick incidents and other accidental exposures to bloodborne pathogens in healthcare facilities have been published by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for more than 2 decades. Over the years, the incidence of official enforcement actions ha...
متن کاملصدمات فرو رفتن سرسوزن آلوده و میزان گزارش دهی این صدمات در پرستاران بالینی
Background & Aim: Exposure to blood-borne pathogens by needlestick injuries (NSIs) continues to pose significant risks to healthcare workers (HCW). The number of contaminated NSIs sustained by HCW primarily due to underreporting, is still unclear. Therefore the objective of this study was to investigate the Needlestick Injuries and the rate of reporting among Clinical Nurses. Material &Method:...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Infection control and hospital epidemiology
دوره 36 12 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2015