Why do UK banks securitize?
نویسندگان
چکیده
The eight years from 2000 to 2008 saw a rapid growth in the use of securitization by UK banks. We aim to identify the reasons that contributed to this rapid growth. The time period (2000 to 2010) covered by our study is noteworthy as it covers the pre- nancial crisis creditboom, the peak of the nancial crisis and its aftermath. In the wake of the nancial crisis, many governments, regulators and political commentators have pointed an accusing nger at the securitization market even in the absence of a detailed statistical and economic analysis. We contribute to the extant literature by performing such an analysis on UK banks, focussing principally on whether it is the need for liquidity (i.e. the funding of their balance sheets), or the desire to engage in regulatory capital arbitrage or the need for credit risk transfer that has led to UK banks securitizing their assets. We show that securitization has been signi cantly driven by liquidity reasons. In addition, we observe a positive link between securitization and banks credit risk. We interpret these latter ndings as evidence that UK banks which engaged in securitization did so, in part, to transfer credit risk and that, in comparison to UK banks which did not use securitization, they had more credit risk to transfer in the sense that they originated lower quality loans and held lower quality assets. We show that banks which issued more asset-backed securities before the nancial crisis su¤ered more defaults after the nancial crisis. JEL Classi cation: G21, G28 Acknowledgement 1 We are grateful to Jo Danbolt and Hong Liu for comments. The usual disclaimer applies
منابع مشابه
Why Do Banks Securitize? the Case of Italy
This paper explores the motivations underlying the securitization activities of Italian banks from 1999 to 2006. The hypotheses under investigation are those of funding, specialization and regulatory capital arbitrage. To test which of the incentives suggested by these hypotheses are statistically significant securitization’s determinants, we estimate a probit model, in which the probability of...
متن کاملSecuritization and Lending Competition
We study the e¤ects of securitization on interbank lending competition when banks see private signals of local applicants repayment chances. If banks cannot securitize, the outcome is e¢ cient: they lend to their most creditworthy local applicants. With securitization, banks lend also to remote applicants with strong observables in order to lessen the lemons problem they face in selling their ...
متن کاملNber Working Paper Series Securitization without Risk Transfer
We analyze asset-backed commercial paper conduits which played a central role in the early phase of the financial crisis of 2007-09. We document that commercial banks set up conduits to securitize assets while insuring the newly securitized assets using credit guarantees. The credit guarantees were structured to reduce bank capital requirements, while providing recourse to bank balance sheets f...
متن کاملRunning head: INTERNATIONALISATION PROCESS OF NIGERIAN BANKS
Research investigating internationalisation process of service firms from developing countries is limited. This paper draws on extant work on internationalisation of the firm, services’ internationalisation and proposes conceptual framework that investigates the internationalisation process of three leading Nigerian banks namely; Zenith Bank Nigeria (ZBN)Plc, First Bank of Nigeria (FBN) Plc and...
متن کاملWhy Do Government Banks Perform Worse? —A Political Interference View
This study proposes a political interference hypothesis to explain how political considerations depress government banks performance. In here, we define the political interference as the situation in which the executives of government banks are replaced within 12 months after the presidential elections. We classify government banks into political and non-political banks when the government bank...
متن کامل