Ellipsis, Subsentential Speech, and the Contextualism Discussion
نویسنده
چکیده
The nature of ellipsis resolution has long been the topic of a heated discussion in the linguistics literature. Ellipsis is a widespread linguistic phenomenon. I show here that an adequate account of ellipsis will have to make use of context in the sense of previous discourse. “Syntactic” accounts of ellipsis are no way out of this. This will be an argument for contextualists who claim that “what is said” depends largely on surrounding context. It also sheds light on the status of subsentential speech, in particular it shows that subsuming it under ellipsis can’t save a semantic minimalist account of subsentential utterances.
منابع مشابه
Subsentential utterances, ellipsis, and pragmatic enrichment
It is argued that genuinely subsentential phrases can be used to perform speech acts with truth conditions. Attempts to assimilate this phenomenon to syntactic ellipsis (sluicing, gapping, etc.) are discussed, and are rejected on the grounds that any implementation of this idea will involve a redundant level of representation in natural language that plays no role in the interpretation process,...
متن کاملEpistemic Invariantism and Speech Act Contextualism
This paper shows how to reconcile epistemic invariantism with the knowledge account of assertion. My basic proposal is that we can comfortably combine invariantism with the knowledge account of assertion by endorsing contextualism about speech acts. My demonstration takes place against the backdrop of recent contextualist attempts to usurp the knowledge account of assertion, most notably Keith ...
متن کاملA Contrastive Study of Persian and English Written Discourse: Ellipsis in Realistic Novels
This study aspires to examine the concept of ellipsis by comparing and contrasting English and Persian written texts. For this purpose, three Persian novels and three English ones were selected. These novels were analyzed carefully; they were compared and contrasted for types and amount of ellipsis used, through a Chi-square analysis. The results of the data analysis revealed that various t...
متن کاملTruth-Theoretic Contextualism: Dissolving the Minimalism/Contextualism Debate
INTRODUCTION The scope of the research field of semantics seems to shrink in the recent debate between the viewpoints of contextualism and (semantic) minimalism. Minimalists hold that semantics is the formal endeavour that derives a minimal proposition from the syntactically structured input string. This semantic content is then fed to the subsequent pragmatic module in which meaning is supplem...
متن کاملA Conversation Analysis of Ellipsis and Substitution in Global Business English Textbooks
Despite the body of research on textbook evaluation from the discourse analysis perspective, cohesive devices have rarely been analyzed in English for Specific Purposes (ESP) textbooks. The acquisition and use of cohesive devices is inherent to naturalistic communication, including business interactions. Hence, L2 learners of business English should be exposed to these devices through cohesion-...
متن کامل