How Many Turing Degrees are There ?
نویسندگان
چکیده
A Borel equivalence relation on a Polish space is countable if all of its equivalence classes are countable. Standard examples of countable Borel equivalence relations (on the space of subsets of the integers) that occur in recursion theory are: recursive isomorphism, Turing equivalence, arithmetic equivalence, etc. There is a canonical hierarchy of complexity of countable Borel equivalence relations imposed by the notion of Borel reducibility. We will survey results and conjectures concerning the problem of identifying the place in this hierarchy of these equivalence relations from recursion theory and also discuss some of their implications. The obvious answer to the question of the title is: continuum many. There is however a different way of looking at this question, which leads to some very interesting open problems in the interface of recursion theory and descriptive set theory. Our goal in this paper is to explain the context in which this and related problems can be formulated, i.e., the theory of Borel equivalence relations, and survey some of the progress to date. 1. Formulation of the problem We denote by =r the Turing equivalence relation on P(N) = {X : X <:;; N}, which we identify with 2N, viewing sets as characteristic functions. (We use the standard set-theoretic convention that n = {0, 1, ... , n 1} for all natural numbers n.) Then =r is a Borel (in fact~~) equivalence relation on 2N. We denote by V the quotient space 2N /(=r), i.e., the set of Turing degrees. Now consider general Borel equivalence relations on 2N or even arbitrary Polish (separable completely metrizable) spaces. We measure their complexity by studying the following partial (pre )order of Borel reducibility: if E, F are Borel equivalence relations on X, Y respectively, then a Borel reduction of E into F is a Borel map f : X ~ Y such that xEy -<====} f(x)Ff(y). If such an f exists we say that E is Borel reducible to F and denote this by E ~B F. Let also E "'B F -<====} E ~B F & F ~BE 1991 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 03D30, 03E15; Secondary 04A15, 54H05. The first author was partially supported by NSF Grant DMS 9158092. The second author was partially supported by NSF Grant DMS 9619880. © 2000 American 1\ilathemat ical Society
منابع مشابه
Some improvements in fuzzy turing machines
In this paper, we improve some previous definitions of fuzzy-type Turing machines to obtain degrees of accepting and rejecting in a computational manner. We apply a BFS-based search method and some level’s upper bounds to propose a computational process in calculating degrees of accepting and rejecting. Next, we introduce the class of Extended Fuzzy Turing Machines equipped with indeterminacy s...
متن کاملMANY - ONE REDUCIBILITY WITHIN THE TURING DEGREES OF THE HYPERARITHMETIC SETS HJx ) ( i )
Spector [l3] has proven that the hyperarithmetic sets H Ax) and H Ax) have the same Turing degree iff \a\ = |è|. Y. Moschovakis has bat the sets /_a proven that H {x) under many-one reducibility for \a\ = y and a e Q have nontrivial reducibility properties if y is not of the form a + 1 or a + cu for any ordinal a. In particular, he proves that there are chains of order type o and incomparable m...
متن کاملMass Problems
Informally, mass problems are similar to decision problems. The difference is that, while a decision problem has only one solution, a mass problem is allowed to have more than one solution. Many concepts which apply to decision problems apply equally well to mass problems. For instance, a mass problem is said to be solvable if it has at least one computable solution. Also, one mass problem is s...
متن کاملInterpreting True Arithmetic in the ∆2-Enumeration Degrees
When working with a mathematical structure, it is natural to ask how complicated the first order theory of the structure is. In the case of structures that can be interpreted in first order arithmetic, this is equivalent to asking if the theory is as complex as possible, namely is it as complex as first order arithmetic. Restricting our attention to the language of partial orders, ≤, there have...
متن کاملDegree Structures
The Turing degrees 3d were introduced by Kleene and Post ([9], 1954) to isolate and study those properties of the subsets of the natural numbers N which are expressed purely in terms of relative computability. Intuitively, we form 3d by identifying any pair of subsets of N which are mutually computable and ordering the resulting equivalence classes by relative computability. The natural hierarc...
متن کاملOn minimal wtt-degrees and computably enumerable Turing degrees
Computability theorists have studied many different reducibilities between sets of natural numbers including one reducibility (≤1), many-one reducibility (≤m), truth table reducibility (≤tt), weak truth table reducibility (≤wtt) and Turing reducibility (≤T ). The motivation for studying reducibilities stronger that Turing reducibility stems from internally motivated questions about varying the ...
متن کامل