The Case for Temporal Transparency: Detecting Policy Change Events in Black-Box Decision Making Systems
نویسندگان
چکیده
Bringing transparency to black-box decision making systems (DMS) has been a topic of increasing research interest in recent years. Traditional active and passive approaches to make these systems transparent are often limited by scalability and/or feasibility issues. In this paper, we propose a new notion of black-box DMS transparency, named, temporal transparency, whose goal is to detect if/when the DMS policy changes over time, and is mostly invariant to the drawbacks of traditional approaches. We map our notion of temporal transparency to time series changepoint detection methods, and develop a framework to detect policy changes in real-world DMS’s. Experiments on New York Stop-questionand-frisk dataset reveal a number of publicly announced and unannounced policy changes, highlighting the utility of our framework.
منابع مشابه
Explanations In Recommender Systems: Overview And Research Approaches
Recommender systems are software tools that supply users with suggestions for items to buy. However, it was found that many recommender systems functioned as black boxes and did not provide transparency or any information on how their internal parts work. Therefore, explanations were used to show why a specific recommendation was provided. The importance of explanations has been approved in a n...
متن کاملMoving Towards Accountability for Reasonableness – A Systematic Exploration of the Features of Legitimate Healthcare Coverage Decision-Making Processes Using Rare Diseases and Regenerative Therapies as a Case Study
Background The accountability for reasonableness (A4R) framework defines 4 conditions for legitimate healthcare coverage decision processes: Relevance, Publicity, Appeals, and Enforcement. The aim of this study was to reflect on how the diverse features of decision-making processes can be aligned with A4R conditions to guide decisio...
متن کاملThe selection of talent as a group process. A literature review on the social dynamics of decision making in grant panels
Talent selection within science is increasingly performed by panels, e.g. by reviewing grant or fellowship applications. Many studies from fields of sociology of science and science policy studies have been conducted to identify biases and predict outcomes of these processes, mainly focusing on characteristics of applicants, applications, and reviewers. However, as panel reviewing entails socia...
متن کاملCCollaborative Framework for Decision Making Process of the Water Management (Case Study: Kashafrood Basin)
Sophisticated social- ecology systems, such as those in water management in a basin, are usually dynamic, multidimensional, or multidimensional, requiring serious engagement by multiple actors, and decision making in such systems is always faced with serious problems Kashafrood basin in Khorasan Razavi province is one of the most critical aquifers in the country due to the high population growt...
متن کاملنقش ارزیابی فناوری سلامت در تصمیمگیری مبتنی بر شواهد و سیاستگذاری در حوزه سلامت
Introduction: The purpose of this study was to show the major challenges and opportunities related to Health Technology Assessment (HTA) that most countries have faced with when launching and developing an HTA system for making appropriate decisions in policy making.Review of studies: This was a review study in the field of HTA and health policy. All literature potentially relevant to this...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- CoRR
دوره abs/1610.10064 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2016