Epistemic and evidential marking in discourse: Effects of register and debatability
نویسندگان
چکیده
The use of evidential and epistemic marking as a rhetorical strategy has received little attention in the literature. Speakers often make judgments on the basis of perceptual, reported, or inferred evidence, thus the relationship between epistemicity and evidentiality is often close and difficult to demarcate. However, whereas epistemicity involves the speaker’s or writer’s evaluation, judgment and degree of commitment attached to the truth-value of a piece of information, evidentiality involves the speaker’s or writer’s assertion of the source and kind of evidence at their disposal (De Haan, 2001, 2005; Mushin, 2001; Nuyts, 2005). Both of these semantic notions have been thoroughly dealt with in regard to morphosyntactic, lexical and grammatical marking, but relatively little has been investigated in pragmatic and textual terms. The present study approaches the indexing of epistemicity and evidentiality from the point of view of register by analyzing a total of 30 oral and 30 written productions of two opinion reports (one dealing with a debatable issue and the other with a nondebatable issue) produced by 15 Catalan speakers. The main aim of the paper is to test the potential effects of register (i.e., oral vs. written discourse) and debatability (i.e., debatable vs. nondebatable issue) on the discourse marking of evidentiality and epistemicity. With respect to the effects of register, results confirm that the use of both epistemic and evidential markers is significantly higher in the oral than in the written reports, and specifically the use of low certainty epistemic markers and direct evidential markers. With respect to the effects of debatability, results show that there is a more profuse use of epistemics than evidentials in the debatable than in the nondebatable condition, and specifically the use of low certainty markers and common knowledge and reported evidential markers. In general, these results support the view that register and debatability are two important factors that condition the use of evidentiality and epistemicity in the construction of discourse epistemic stance. © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
منابع مشابه
Projecting Cultural Identity through Metadiscourse Marking; A Comparison of Persian and English Research Articles
Writing projects are socially-situated identities. The rhetorically-loaded aspects of writing, like metadiscourse marking, are more prone to carry such identities. Through analyzing metadiscourse strategies employment in Persian and English (as the lingua franca of academic discourse community) research articles, this study makes an attempt to find out whether Persian native writers take on the...
متن کاملOn the nature of the epistemic readings of the Italian modal verbs: the relationship between propositionality and inferential discourse relations
The present contribution deals with the epistemic readings of the Italian modal verbs dovere ('must') and potere ('may'/'can'). The two verbs show striking differences — both quantitative and qualitative — with respect to the possibility of epistemic interpretation, differences which have gone so far completely unnoticed in the — rather scarce — semantic literature on modal verbs in Italian. Ev...
متن کاملPartitive Morphosemantics across Estonian Grammatical Categories, and Case Variation with Equi and Raising
This article discusses two related case marking phenomena in Estonian. The first issue is representing partitive morphosemantics as it is expressed in the language specific aspectual, epistemic modal and evidential grammatical categories. A DRT based sketch of propositional attitudes and speaker-hearer relationships explicates several semantic links between the categories. The second case marki...
متن کاملA Comparative Analysis of Epistemic and Root Modality in Two selected English Books in the Field of Applied Linguistics Written by English Native and Iranian Non-native Writers
Academic discourse has always been the focus of many linguists, especially those who have been involved with English for Academic Purposes (EAP) and discourse analysis. Persuasion, as part of rhetorical structure of academic writing, is partly achieved by employing modality markers. Adopting a descriptive design, the present study was carried out to compare the use of modality markers in terms...
متن کاملA Cross-linguistic and Cross-cultural Study of Epistemic Modality Markers in Linguistics Research Articles
Epistemic modality devices are believed to be one of the prominent characteristics of research articles as the commonly used genre among the academic community members. Considering the importance of such devices in producing and comprehending scientific discourse, this study aimed to cross–culturally and cross-linguistically investigate epistemic modality markers as an important subcategory...
متن کامل