Accepting brain death.
نویسندگان
چکیده
death was determined by means of multiple independent neurologic examinations, including one ordered by a court. Her family refused to accept that she had died and went to court to prevent physicians at Children’s Hospital and Research Center in Oakland from discontinuing ventilator support. Per a court-supervised agreement, the body was given to the family 3 weeks after the initial determination. The family’s attorney stated that ventilatory support was continued and nutritional support added at an undisclosed location. In Fort Worth, Texas, Marlise Muñoz’s body was maintained on mechanical ventilation for 8 weeks after the medical and legal criteria for death were met, in an attempt to “rescue” her fetus. Muñoz was 14 weeks pregnant when she died from pulmonary embolism. Her family asserted that continuing ventilatory support was contrary to what the patient would have wanted, but John Peter Smith Hospital cited a state law requiring that support not be terminated if a patient is pregnant. A judge ultimately ordered that the hospital follow the medically and legally indicated steps of declaring the patient dead and removing ventilatory support. The McMath family’s attorney claimed that their constitutional rights were violated and their religious beliefs (both about when death occurs and about prognosticating a possibility of recovery) were not respected. In making this argument, proponents of allowing family members to determine death threaten to undermine decades of law, medicine, and ethics. The current U.S. approach to determining death was developed in response to the emergence of technologies that made the traditional standard of cardiopulmonary death problematic. In 1968, an ad hoc committee at Harvard Medical School published an influential article arguing for extending the concept of death to patients in an “irreversible coma.”1 The emerging neurologic criteria for death defined it in terms of loss of the functional activity of the brain stem and cerebral cortex. Although clinical criteria were developed in the 1960s, it took more than a decade for consenAccepting Brain Death
منابع مشابه
Knowledge and attitude of medical students on brain death and organ donation
Results A total of 90 questionnaires were assessed. Based on the students’ response the following opinions were noted. 25% of students believed brain death is equal to human death. 91% students responded that there is no treatment for brain dead patients. 62% of students accepted the concept of brain death. Religious and social reasons were the commonest reason for non-acceptance of brain death...
متن کاملBrain Death: Past, Present and Future
Sometimes it is been said, that the concept of brain death was “invented” in Boston 1968 for the only purpose of organ donation. – The first part (“past”) clarifies, that the concept of brain death has been elaborated in Europe between 1952 and 1960 without any correlation to the development of organ transplantation. The second part (“present”) deals with the acceptance of brain death in common...
متن کاملA survey of American neurologists about brain death: understanding the conceptual basis and diagnostic tests for brain death
BACKGROUND Neurologists often diagnose brain death (BD) and explain BD to families in the intensive care unit. This study was designed to determine whether neurologists agree with the standard concept of death (irreversible loss of integrative unity of the organism) and understand the state of the brain when BD is diagnosed. METHODS A previously validated survey was mailed to a random sample ...
متن کاملDon't pull the plug on brain death just yet.
In this issue of Tradition, Dr. J. Kunin reviews the medical literature relating to the anatomical and physiological studies of the brain dead patient. Based on the medical evidence that there remain both physiological function and some anatomical integrity of the brain in these patients, he argues that the original halakhic legal decisions accepting brain death as halakhic death need to be re-...
متن کاملThe study of brain death in Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari province in Iran from 2003 to 2013
Background and aims: There are different causes for brain death including head trauma, cerebrovascular accidents and intracranial space-occupying lesions. The present study was aimed to determine the causes of brain death in Chahar Mahal and Bakhtiari province due to high turnover of trauma in this area during 2003 to 2013...
متن کاملآموزش؛ حلقه طلایی رفع چالشهای پرستاران در فرایند مراقبت از بیماران مرگ مغزی
Statistics show that brain death constitutes 1-4% of hospital deaths and 10% of the deaths occurred at the intensive care units (1). In the United States, brain death accounts for less than 1% of all deaths (about 15000 to 20000) (2). According to Iranian statistics, more than 15000 brain deaths occur every year in Iran, and driving accidents are one of its main causes (3-6). Then, these patien...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- The New England journal of medicine
دوره 370 10 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2014