Strong Normalisation of Cut-Elimination in Classical Logic

نویسندگان

  • Christian Urban
  • Gavin M. Bierman
چکیده

In this paper we present a strongly normalising cut-elimination procedure for classical logic. This procedure adapts Gentzen’s standard cut-reductions, but is less restrictive than previous strongly normalising cut-elimination procedures. In comparison, for example, with works by Dragalin and Danos et al., our procedure requires no special annotations on formulae and allows cut-rules to pass over other cut-rules. In order to adapt the notion of symmetric reducibility candidates for proving the strong normalisation property, we introduce a novel term assignment for sequent proofs of classical logic and formalise cut-reductions as term rewriting rules.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Strong Normalisation for a Gentzen-like Cut-Elimination Procedure

In this paper we introduce a cut-elimination procedure for classical logic, which is both strongly normalising and consisting of local proof transformations. Traditional cut-elimination procedures, including the one by Gentzen, are formulated so that they only rewrite neighbouring inference rules; that is they use local proof transformations. Unfortunately, such local proof transformation, if d...

متن کامل

Atomic Cut Elimination for classical Logic

System SKS is a set of rules for classical propositional logic presented in the calculus of structures. Like sequent systems and unlike natural deduction systems, it has an explicit cut rule, which is admissible. In contrast to sequent systems, the cut rule can easily be restricted to atoms. This allows for a very simple cut elimination procedure based on plugging in parts of a proof, like norm...

متن کامل

Terms for Natural Deduction, Sequent Calculus and Cut Elimination in Classical Logic

This paper revisits the results of Barendregt and Ghilezan [3] and generalizes them for classical logic. Instead of λ-calculus, we use here λμ-calculus as the basic term calculus. We consider two extensionally equivalent type assignment systems for λμ-calculus, one corresponding to classical natural deduction, and the other to classical sequent calculus. Their relations and normalisation proper...

متن کامل

A New Machine-checked Proof of Strong Normalisation for Display Logic

We use a deep embedding of the display calculus for relation algebras δRA in the logical framework Isabelle/HOL to formalise a new, machine-checked, proof of strong normalisation and cut-elimination for δRA which does not use measures on the size of derivations. Our formalisation generalises easily to other display calculi and can serve as a basis for formalised proofs of strong normalisation f...

متن کامل

Revisiting the Correspondence between Cut Elimination and Normalisation

Cut-free proofs in Herbelin’s sequent calculus are in 1-1 correspondence with normal natural deduction proofs. For this reason Herbelin’s sequent calculus has been considered a privileged middle-point between L-systems and natural deduction. However, this bijection does not extend to proofs containing cuts and Herbelin observed that his cutelimination procedure is not isomorphic to β-reduction....

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Fundam. Inform.

دوره 45  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 1999