Two - person bargaining with verifiable information
نویسندگان
چکیده
We study Myerson’s incomplete information bargaining solution under the assumption of verifiable types. For the case of an informed principal, in which one individual has all the bargaining power, we provide exact characterizations both from the non cooperative and from the cooperative perspective. We then show that the axiomatic characterization can be extended to the case in which both individuals have some bargaining power. Myerson’s approach also suggests a new definition of the core that refines Wilson’s coarse core. We argue that this refinement captures an important aspect of negotiation at the interim stage. JEL Classification: C71.
منابع مشابه
Vehicle Routing Problem in Competitive Environment: Two-Person Nonzero Sum Game Approach
Vehicle routing problem is one of the most important issues in transportation. Among VRP problems, the competitive VRP is more important because there is a tough competition between distributors and retailers. In this study we introduced new method for VRP in competitive environment. In these methods Two-Person Nonzero Sum games are defined to choose equilibrium solution. Therefore, revenue giv...
متن کاملSignaling and Plea Bargaining’s Innocence Problem
The dominant theoretical model of plea bargaining predicts that, under conditions of full information and rational choice, criminal cases should uniformly be settled through plea bargaining. That prediction holds for innocent and guilty defendants alike. Because it is perfectly rational for innocent defendants to plead guilty, plea bargaining might be said to have an "innocence problem." Plea b...
متن کاملRelative Concerns and Delays in Bargaining with Private Information
We consider Rubinstein’s two-person alternating-offer bargaining model with two-sided incomplete information. We investigate the effects of one party having relative concerns about the bargaining outcome and the delay in reaching an agreement. We find that facing an opponent with stronger relative concerns only hurts the bargainer when she is stronger than her opponent. In addition, we show tha...
متن کاملDyadic Processes of Disclosure andReciprocity in Bargaining with Communication
We offer a study revealing the mechanisms through which communication helps actual bargaining behavior outperform economic predictions. The possibility of individually strategic behavior in the presence of private information leads to game-theoretic predictions of less than full efficiency. We present a one-stage, simultaneous offers bargaining game in which buyers and sellers have independent,...
متن کاملInformation Sharing and Oligopoly in Agricultural Markets: The Role of the Cooperative Bargaining Association Brent Hueth and Philippe Marcoul Abstract: We study incentives for information sharing among agricultural intermediaries in imperfectly competitive markets for farm
We study incentives for information sharing among agricultural intermediaries in imperfectly competitive markets for farm output. Information sharing always increases expected grower and total surplus, but may reduce expected intermediary profits. Even when expected profits increase with information sharing, intermediary firms face a Prisoner’s Dilemma where it is privately rational to withhold...
متن کامل