Unclear Implications: Commentary on Norton and Ariely (2011).
نویسنده
چکیده
Despite the suggestiveness of their empirical findings, I argue that the implications of Norton and Ariely's work are unclear, both morally and politically.
منابع مشابه
Consensus at the Heart of Division: Commentary on Norton and Ariely (2011).
We argue that seemingly deep-seated partisan divisions may be built on a foundation of surprising consensus, not only in terms of the wealth distributions that people prefer (Norton & Ariely, 2011, this issue), but also in the gut-level moral reactions and beliefs about money and happiness that may underlie those preferences.
متن کاملAmerican’s desire for less wealth inequality does not depend on how you ask them
A large body of survey research offers evidence that citizens are not always fully aware of the economic and political realities in their respective countries. Norton and Ariely (2011) extended this research to the domain of wealth inequality, showing that Americans were surprisingly unaware of the shape of the wealth distribution in America. Using an alternative methodology, Eriksson and Simps...
متن کاملThe available evidence suggests the percent measure should not be used to study inequality: Reply to Norton and Ariely
In this reply, we reiterate the main point of our 2012 paper, which was that the measure of inequality used by Norton and Ariely (2011) was too difficult for it to yield meaningful results. We describe additional evidence for this conclusion, and we also challenge the conclusion that political differences in perceived and desired inequality are small.
متن کاملDoes Familiarity Breed Contempt or Liking ?
Reis, Maniaci, Caprariello, Eastwick, and Finkel (2011) conducted 2 studies that demonstrate that in certain cases, familiarity can lead to liking—in seeming contrast to the results of our earlier article (Norton, Frost, & Ariely, 2007). We believe that Reis et al. (a) utilized paradigms far removed from spontaneous, everyday social interactions that were particularly likely to demonstrate a po...
متن کاملJoint comment on "when does duration matter in judgment and decision making?" (Ariely & Loewenstein, 2000).
Recent research has demonstrated that people care about the temporal relationships within a sequence of experiences. There is considerable evidence that people pay particular attention to the way experiences improve or deteriorate over time and to their maximum (peak) and final values. D. Kahneman and coauthors suggested in earlier articles that people ignore or severely underweight duration (w...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science
دوره 6 1 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2011