Electronic Data Capture through Total Joint Replacement Registries
نویسندگان
چکیده
The move toward adoption and implementation of electronic health records (EHR) provides an opportunity in the United States to use electronic clinical data (ECD) to better understand patient outcomes and to improve the quality and efficiency of medical care. Within the field of orthopedics, national joint replacement registries have been shown in other countries to improve clinical decision-making and outcomes after joint arthroplasty. Thus, there is increasing interest among U.S. clinical investigators and policymakers to utilize ECD to develop national and regional joint replacement registries. We discuss our experience with integrating electronic data capture and reporting methodology into the California Joint Replacement Registry and American Joint Replacement Registry initiatives. The use of ECD for joint replacement registries will better facilitate multi-stakeholder collaboration, improve the quality of care, reduce medical spending, and foster customized evidence-based clinical decision-making.
منابع مشابه
Implementation of patient-reported outcome measures in U.S. Total joint replacement registries: rationale, status, and plans.
BACKGROUND In the U.S. and abroad, the use of patient-reported outcome measures to evaluate the impact of total joint replacement surgery on patient quality of life is increasingly common. Analyses of patient-reported outcomes have documented substantial pain relief and functional gain among the vast majority of patients managed with total joint replacement. In addition, postoperative patient-r...
متن کاملInfection burden in total hip and knee arthroplasties: an international registry-based perspective
BACKGROUND Infection remains a leading cause of failure of hip and knee replacements. Infection burden is the ratio of implants revised for infection to the total number of arthroplasties in a specific period, measuring the steady state of infection in a registry. We hypothesized infection burden would be similar among arthroplasty registries. METHODS We evaluated publicly reported data from ...
متن کاملNext-Generation Registries: Fusion of Data for Care, and Research
Disease-based registries are a critical tool for electronic data capture of high-quality, gold standard data for clinical research as well as for population management in clinical care. Yet, a legacy of significant operational costs, resource requirements, and poor data liquidity have limited their use. Research registries have engendered more than $3 Billion in HHS investment over the past 17 ...
متن کاملCollecting Patient-Reported Outcomes: Lessons from the California Joint Replacement Registry
CONTEXT While patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have long been used for research, recent technology advancements make it easier to collect patient feedback and use it for patient care. Despite the promise and appeal of PROs, substantial barriers to widespread adoption remain-including challenges in interpreting privacy regulations, educating patients and physicians about the power that PRO colle...
متن کاملComparing contemporary revision burden among hip and knee joint replacement registries
BACKGROUND Hip and knee arthroplasties are common and successful procedures, however, success and durability are not guaranteed. The revision burden, defined as the ratio of implant revisions to the total number of arthroplasties in a specific period, is a measure of the steady state of arthroplasty success in a given registry. This study examines the hypothesis that revision burden would be si...
متن کامل