Patient- and treatment-related determinants of convective volume in post-dilution haemodiafiltration in clinical practice.
نویسندگان
چکیده
BACKGROUND Large convective volumes are recommended for online haemodiafiltration (HDF) to maximize solute removal. There has been little systematic evaluation of factors that determine convective volumes in routine clinical practice. METHODS In the present study, potential patient- and treatment-related determinants of convective volume were analysed in 235 consecutive patients on post-dilution HDF using multivariable linear regression models. All patients (age 64 +/- 14 years; 61% male) participated in the ongoing CONvective TRAnsport STudy (CONTRAST). Additionally, differences in convective volumes between dialysers were evaluated. RESULTS The mean convective volume was 19.4 +/- 4.0 L (+/-SD) per treatment, with a large variation between the participating centres (centre means ranging from 13.4 +/- 0.9 L to 24.5 +/- 0.12 L, +/- SE). The mean filtration fraction of the blood flow was 25.9 +/- 3.6. In the multivariable analysis, factors that were significantly related to convective volume were haematocrit [inversely, regression coefficient (B) = -1.4 +/- 0.4 L per 10%], serum albumin (positively, B = 1.0 +/- 0.4 L per 10 g/L), blood flow rate (positively, B = 0.4 +/- 0.04 L per 10 mL/min) and treatment time (positively, B = 5.1 +/- 0.4 L/h). In addition, significant differences between dialysers were observed, likely explained by different operational conditions. CONCLUSIONS Apart from increasing the treatment time and blood flow rate, convective volumes could be optimized by increasing the filtration fraction in each individual, provided that transmembrane pressures are well within safe limits. The precise role of dialyser characteristics on maximal achievable convective volumes in clinical practice is a topic for further research.
منابع مشابه
Effective removal of protein-bound uraemic solutes by different convective strategies: a prospective trial.
BACKGROUND Although different on-line convective removal strategies are available, there are no studies comparing the efficiency of solute removal for the three main options [post-dilution haemodiafiltration (post-HDF), pre-dilution haemodiafiltration (pre-HDF) and pre-dilution haemofiltration (pre-HF)] in parallel. METHODS In this study, we compared post-HDF (Polyflux 170), pre-HDF (Polyflux...
متن کاملHigh convection volume in online post-dilution haemodiafiltration: relevance, safety and costs
Increasing evidence suggests that treatment with online post-dilution haemodiafiltration (HDF) improves clinical outcome in patients with end-stage kidney disease, if compared with haemodialysis (HD). Although the primary analyses of three large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) showed inconclusive results, post hoc analyses of these and previous observational studies comparing online post-di...
متن کاملExtended daily on-line high-volume haemodiafiltration in septic multiple organ failure: a well-tolerated and feasible procedure.
BACKGROUND The outcome of patients with septic multiple organ failure (MOF) remains poor. There are experimental and clinical data indicating a beneficial effect of high-volume haemofiltration. Delivering high-volume therapy is only cost effective using on-line devices because of high costs for additional solution bags in conventional continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). We investigated...
متن کاملNew modalities for non-invasive positive pressure ventilation: A review article
Efficiency of non-invasive positive pressure ventilation in the treatment of respiratory failure has been shown in many published studies. In this review article, we introduced new modalities of non-invasive ventilation (NIV), clinical settings in which NIV can be used and a practical summary of the latest official guidelines published by the European Respiratory Clinical Practice. Clinical tri...
متن کاملRemoval of water-soluble and protein-bound solutes with reversed mid-dilution versus post-dilution haemodiafiltration.
BACKGROUND Convective dialysis strategies are superior in the removal of protein-bound uraemic retention solutes. Mid-dilution and mixed-dilution haemodiafiltration (HDF), both combining pre-dilution and post-dilution, are promising options to further improve removal capacity and have been shown of additional benefit for large middle molecules. In this study, we compared the removal of small wa...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association
دوره 24 11 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2009