Modeling Annotator Rationales with Application to Pneumonia Classification
نویسندگان
چکیده
We present a technique to leverage annotator rationale annotations for ventilator assisted pneumonia (VAP) classification. Given an annotated training corpus of 1344 narrative chest X-ray reports, we report results for two supervised classification tasks: Critical Pulmonary Infection Score (CPIS) and the likelihood of Pneumonia (PNA). For both tasks, our training data contain annotator rationale snippets (i.e., spans of text that are relevant to annotator decisions). Because we assume that the snippet is not marked in the test data, we first built a sequential labeler to detect the location of snippets. The detected snippets are then used by the CPIS and PNA classifiers. Our experiments demonstrate that having access to detected annotator rationale leads to an incremental improvement in classification accuracy from 0.858 to 0.871 for CPIS, and from 0.785 to 0.821 for PNA.
منابع مشابه
Modeling Annotators: A Generative Approach to Learning from Annotator Rationales
A human annotator can provide hints to a machine learner by highlighting contextual “rationales” for each of his or her annotations (Zaidan et al., 2007). How can one exploit this side information to better learn the desired parameters θ? We present a generative model of how a given annotator, knowing the true θ, stochastically chooses rationales. Thus, observing the rationales helps us infer t...
متن کاملAutomatically Generating Annotator Rationales to Improve Sentiment Classification
One of the central challenges in sentimentbased text categorization is that not every portion of a document is equally informative for inferring the overall sentiment of the document. Previous research has shown that enriching the sentiment labels with human annotators’ “rationales” can produce substantial improvements in categorization performance (Zaidan et al., 2007). We explore methods to a...
متن کاملMachine Learning with Annotator Rationales to Reduce Annotation Cost
We review two novel methods for text categorization, based on a new framework that utilizes richer annotations that we call annotator rationales. A human annotator provides hints to a machine learner by highlighting contextual “rationales” in support of each of his or her annotations. We have collected such rationales, in the form of substrings, for an existing document sentiment classification...
متن کاملImproving Gender Prediction of Social Media Users via Weighted Annotator Rationales
This paper proposes and contrastively evaluates several novel approaches to utilizing annotator rationales to improve the prediction of user gender in social media for English and Spanish. Our methods outperform state-of-the-art systems for Twitter gender prediction, and yield up to 28% error reduction relative to an otherwise identical system and training data without the use of annotator rati...
متن کاملUsing "Annotator Rationales" to Improve Machine Learning for Text Categorization
We propose a new framework for supervised machine learning. Our goal is to learn from smaller amounts of supervised training data, by collecting a richer kind of training data: annotations with “rationales.” When annotating an example, the human teacher will also highlight evidence supporting this annotation—thereby teaching the machine learner why the example belongs to the category. We provid...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2013