ASP for minimal entailment in a rational extension of SROEL

نویسندگان

  • Laura Giordano
  • Daniele Theseider Dupré
چکیده

In this paper we exploit Answer Set Programming (ASP) for reasoning in a rational extension SROEL(⊓, ×)R T of the low complexity description logic SROEL(⊓,×), which underlies the OWL EL ontology language. In the extended language, a typicality operator T is allowed to define concepts T(C) (typical C’s) under a rational semantics. It has been proven that instance checking under rational entailment has a polynomial complexity. To strengthen rational entailment, in this paper we consider a minimal model semantics. We show that, for arbitrary SROEL(⊓,×)RT knowledge bases, instance checking under minimal entailment is Π2 -complete. Relying on a Small Model result, where models correspond to answer sets of a suitable ASP encoding, we exploit Answer Set Preferences (and, in particular, the asprin framework) for reasoning under minimal entailment. The paper is under consideration for acceptance in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

ASP for Minimal Entailment in a Rational Extension

This work exploits Answer Set Programming (ASP) for reasoning in a rational extension of SROEL(⊓,×) [5], the low complexity description logic which underlies the OWL EL ontology language. It is based on a preferential approach to defeasible reasoning in description logics (DLs) [2, 3], which has been developed along the lines of the preferential semantics introduced by Kraus, Lehmann and Magido...

متن کامل

Defeasible Reasoning in SROEL: from Rational Entailment to Rational Closure

In this work we study a rational extension SROEL(⊓,×) T of the low complexity description logic SROEL(⊓,×), which underlies the OWL EL ontology language. The extension involves a typicality operator T, whose semantics is based on Lehmann and Magidor’s ranked models and allows for the definition of defeasible inclusions. We consider both rational entailment and minimal entailment. We show that d...

متن کامل

Reasoning in a Rational Extension of SROEL

In this work we define a rational extension SROEL(⊓,×) T of the low complexity description logic SROEL(⊓,×), which underlies the OWL EL ontology language. The logic is extended with a typicality operator T, whose semantics is based on Lehmann and Magidor’s ranked models and allows for the definition of defeasible inclusions. We consider both rational entailment and minimal entailment. We show t...

متن کامل

Adaptive Entailment of Equations over Rational Trees ?

Two variants of an incremental and adaptive entailment algorithm are presented. Both variants decide incrementally whether a xed conjunction of syntactical equations over the rational trees is entailed by another conjunction in rational solved form which may change dynamically. In the case of entailment, an extension of the rational solved form is computed which is equivalent to the conjunction...

متن کامل

Rational Closure in SHIQ

We define a notion of rational closure for the logic SHIQ, which does not enjoys the finite model property, building on the notion of rational closure introduced by Lehmann and Magidor in [24]. We provide a semantic characterization of rational closure in SHIQ in terms of a preferential semantics, based on a finite rank characterization of minimal models. We show that the rational closure of a ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • TPLP

دوره 16  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2016