Collaborative Brain-Computer Interface for Aiding Decision-Making
نویسندگان
چکیده
We look at the possibility of integrating the percepts from multiple non-communicating observers as a means of achieving better joint perception and better group decisions. Our approach involves the combination of a brain-computer interface with human behavioural responses. To test ideas in controlled conditions, we asked observers to perform a simple matching task involving the rapid sequential presentation of pairs of visual patterns and the subsequent decision as whether the two patterns in a pair were the same or different. We recorded the response times of observers as well as a neural feature which predicts incorrect decisions and, thus, indirectly indicates the confidence of the decisions made by the observers. We then built a composite neuro-behavioural feature which optimally combines the two measures. For group decisions, we uses a majority rule and three rules which weigh the decisions of each observer based on response times and our neural and neuro-behavioural features. Results indicate that the integration of behavioural responses and neural features can significantly improve accuracy when compared with the majority rule. An analysis of event-related potentials indicates that substantial differences are present in the proximity of the response for correct and incorrect trials, further corroborating the idea of using hybrids of brain-computer interfaces and traditional strategies for improving decision making.
منابع مشابه
A Collaborative Bci Trained to Aid Group Decisions Ina Visual Search Task Works Well with Similar Tasks
Collaborative brain-computer interfaces (cBCIs) have recently been used to enhance human performance in decision making [1-3]. For instance, [2,3] estimated the confidence of each user in each decision from a combination of neural common spatial patterns (CSP) features and response times (RTs), and used this estimate to weigh individual responses and obtain superior group decisions. In this abs...
متن کاملAssessment of Prospective Memory, Risky Decision-Making, Collaborative Decision-Making among Individuals with Morning and Evening Circadian Typology
Introduction: Biological aspects of personality have an influence on people psychological dimensions. The present study was aimed to compare prospective memory, risky decision-making, collaborative decision-making between individuals with morning and evening circadian typology. Methods: For this purpose, a study with quantitative methodology approach and a descriptive design was conceived. T...
متن کاملA review on EEG based brain computer interface systems feature extraction methods
The brain – computer interface (BCI) provides a communicational channel between human and machine. Most of these systems are based on brain activities. Brain Computer-Interfacing is a methodology that provides a way for communication with the outside environment using the brain thoughts. The success of this methodology depends on the selection of methods to process the brain signals in each pha...
متن کاملA review on EEG based brain computer interface systems feature extraction methods
The brain – computer interface (BCI) provides a communicational channel between human and machine. Most of these systems are based on brain activities. Brain Computer-Interfacing is a methodology that provides a way for communication with the outside environment using the brain thoughts. The success of this methodology depends on the selection of methods to process the brain signals in each pha...
متن کاملHybrid Collaborative Brain-computer Interfaces to Augment Group Decision Making
AUGMENT GROUP DECISION MAKING Davide Valeriani, Caterina Cinel and Riccardo Poli Aims In the recent years, collaborative Brain-Computer Interfaces (cBCIs) have shown the potential to be used in the context of neuroergonomics to augment human performance, for example in decision making. This study proposes an innovative hybrid cBCI to augment group performance in decision making. Methods The pro...
متن کامل