Draft – March 13 , 2017 Arrovian Aggregation via Pairwise Utilitarianism
نویسندگان
چکیده
We consider Arrovian aggregation of preferences over lotteries that are represented by skew-symmetric bilinear (SSB) utility functions, a significant generalization of von Neumann-Morgenstern utility functions due to Fishburn, in which utility is assigned to pairs of alternatives. We show that the largest domain of preferences that simultaneously allows for independence of irrelevant alternatives and Pareto optimality when comparing lotteries based on accumulated SSB welfare is a domain in which preferences over lotteries are completely determined by ordinal preferences over pure alternatives. In particular, a lottery is preferred to another lottery if and only if the former is more likely to return a preferred alternative. Preferences over pure alternatives are unrestricted. We argue that SSB welfare maximization for this domain constitutes an appealing probabilistic social choice function.
منابع مشابه
Arrovian Aggregation of Convex Preferences and Pairwise Utilitarianism
We consider social welfare functions that satisfy Arrow’s classic axioms of independence of irrelevant alternatives and Pareto optimality when the outcome space is the convex hull over some finite set of alternatives. Individual and collective preferences are assumed to be continuous and convex, which guarantees the existence of maximal elements and the consistency of choice functions that retu...
متن کاملMeasurement-Theoretic Foundations of Preference Aggregation Logic for Weighted Utilitarianism
Harsanyi [4, 5] develops expected utility theory of von Neumann and Morgenstern [21] to provide two formalizations of utilitarianism. Weymark [22, 23] refers to these results as Harsanyi’s Aggregation and Impartial Observer Theorems. In this paper, we are concerned only with Aggregation Theorem. Sen [6] argues that von Neumann-Morgenstern expected utility theory is an ordinal theory and, theref...
متن کاملArrovian Impossibilities in Aggregating Preferences over Sets
Given a society confronting a set of alternatives A, we consider the aggregation of individual preferences over the power set A of A into a social preference over A. In case we allow individuals to have any complete and transitive preference over A, Arrow’s impossibility theorem naturally applies. However, the Arrovian impossibility prevails, even when the set of admissible preferences over A i...
متن کاملAggregation of Monotonic Bernoullian Archimedean preferences: Arrovian impossibility results
Cerreia-Vioglio, Ghirardato, Maccheroni, Marinacci and Siniscalchi (Economic Theory, 48:341–375, 2011) have recently proposed a very general axiomatisation of preferences in the presence of ambiguity, viz. Monotonic Bernoullian Archimedean (MBA) preference orderings. This paper investigates the problem of Arrovian aggregation of such preferences — and proves dictatorial impossibility results fo...
متن کاملArrow theorems in the fuzzy setting
Throughout this paper, our main idea is to analyze the Arrovian approach in a fuzzy context, paying attention to different extensions of the classical Arrow's model arising in mathematical Social Choice to aggregate preferences that the agents define on a set of alternatives. There is a wide set of extensions. Some of them give rise to an impossibility theorem as in the Arrovian classical mod...
متن کامل