A questionnaire survey reviewing radiologists’ and clinical specialist radiographers’ knowledge of CT exposure parameters
نویسندگان
چکیده
OBJECTIVE To review knowledge of computed tomography (CT) parameters and their influence on patient dose and image quality amongst a cohort of clinical specialist radiographers (CSRs) and examining radiologists. METHODS A questionnaire survey was devised and distributed to a cohort of 65 examining radiologists attending the American Board of Radiology exam in Kentucky in November 2011. The questionnaire was later distributed by post to a matching cohort of Irish CT CSRs. Each questionnaire contained 40 questions concerning CT parameters and their influence on both patient dose and image quality. RESULTS A response rate of 22 % (radiologists) and 32 % (CSRs) was achieved. No difference in mean scores was detected between either group (27.8 ± 4 vs 28.1 ± 4, P = 0.87) although large ranges were noted (18-36). Considerable variations in understanding of CT parameters was identified, especially regarding operation of automatic exposure control and the influence of kilovoltage and tube current on patient dose and image quality. Radiologists were unaware of recommended diagnostic reference levels. Both cohorts were concerned regarding CT doses in their departments. CONCLUSIONS CT parameters were well understood by both groups. However, a number of deficiencies were noted which may have a considerable impact on patient doses and limit the potential for optimisation in clinical practice. KEY POINTS • CT users must adapt parameters to optimise patient dose and image quality. • The influence of some parameters is not well understood. • A need for ongoing education in dose optimisation is identified.
منابع مشابه
Radiation knowledge and perception of referral practice among radiologists and radiographers compared with referring clinicians
OBJECTIVES To explore if the perception of radiologists and radiographers on referral practice differs from that of referring clinicians, and to see if knowledge of radiation issues and referral guidelines differ between these groups. METHODS A questionnaire was handed out to 46 radiologists and 36 radiographers in Norway. Findings were compared to corresponding results from a similar already...
متن کاملComparative Study of Level of Knowledge, Attitude and Performance of Radiologists, Medical Physicist and Radiographer Regarding Quality Control of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Introduction: The aim of this study was to investigate the level of knowledge, attitude and practice of technicians and Radiologists, Medical Physicists and Radiographers in quality control of MRI devices. Methods and Material: 78 radiologists, medical physicists, and radiographers in seven medical centers of Hamadan were included in this study. Each member duties were determined based on the ...
متن کاملBeliefs and behaviors of radiographers concerning “Digital Chest Radiography”
Aims Chest radiography is the first choice for the investigation of cardiovascular and respiratory disease. Radiographer technologists are responsible for managing the radiation exposure to patients and providing adequate image quality according to the ALARA concept. The knowledge and experience of radiographers in performing chest radiography helps to improve the diagnosis of diseases. The aim...
متن کاملSign language in the CT suite: a new approach in communicating between radiologists and radiographers
When performing CT-guided procedures or angiographic procedures, radiologists performing procedures need to communicate with radiographers at a workstation behind radiation shielding glass. As shielding renders verbal communication impossible, we have developed a set of standardised hand signals for use at our department to help us achieve clear and efficient communication between radiologists ...
متن کاملComparison of the diagnostic performance of CT colonography interpreted by radiologists and radiographers
OBJECTIVE To compare computed tomographic colonography (CTC) performance of four trained radiographers with the CTC performance of two experienced radiologists. METHODS Four radiographers and two radiologists interpreted 87 cases with 40 polyps ≥6 mm. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV) were assessed on a per-patient basis. On a per-polyp basis, sensitivity was calcu...
متن کامل