Aggregation of utility and social choice: a topological characterization
نویسندگان
چکیده
We study the topological properties of aggregation maps combining individuals’ preferences over n alternatives, with preference expressed by a real-valued, n-dimensional utility vector u defined on an interval scale. Since any such utility vector is specified only up to arbitrary affine transformations, the space of utility vectors R may be partitioned into equivalence classes of the form fauþ b1 j aAR0 ; bARg: The quotient space, denoted T ; is shown to be the union of the n 2-dimensional sphere S 1⁄4 S 2 with the singleton f0g; which corresponds to indifference or null preference. The topology of T is non-Hausdorff, placing it outside the scope of most existing theory (e.g., J. Econom. Theory 31 (1983) 68). We then investigate the existence and nature of continuous aggregation maps under the four scenarios of allowing or disallowing null preference both in individual and in social choice, i.e. maps f : P ? P-Q with P;QAfT ;Sg: We show that there exist continuous, anonymous, unanimous aggregation maps iff the outcome space includes the null point ðQ 1⁄4 TÞ; and provide a simple well-behaved example for the case f : S ? S-T : Similar examples exist for f : T ? T-T ; but these and all other maps have a property of always either overor under-allocating influence to each voter (in a specific manner). We conclude that there exist acceptable aggregation rules if and only if null preference is allowed for the society but not for the individual. r 2003 Published by Elsevier Inc.
منابع مشابه
Topological Social Choice Topological Social Choice
The topological approach to social choice was developed by Graciela Chichilnisky in the beginning of the eighties. The main result in this area (known as the resolution of the topological social choice paradox) shows that a space of preferences admits of a continuous, anonymous, and unanimous aggregation rule for every number of individuals if and only if the space is contractible. Furthermore,...
متن کاملTopological aggregation, the twin paradox and the no show paradox
Consider the framework of topological aggregation introduced by Chichilnisky (1980). We prove that in this framework the Twin Paradox and the No Show Paradox cannot be avoided. Anonymity and unanimity are not needed to obtain these results.
متن کاملRational Choice Theory: A Cultural Reconsideration
Economists have heralded the formulation of the expected utility theorem as a universal method of choice under uncertainty. In their seminal paper, Stigler and Becker (Stigler & Becker, 1977) declared that “human behavior can be explained by a generalized calculus of utility-maximizing behavior” (p.76). The universality of the rational choice theory has been widely criticized by psychologists, ...
متن کاملTopological social choice
The topological approach to social choice was developed by Graciela Chichilnisky in the beginning of the 1980s. The main result in this area (known as the resolution of the topological social choice paradox) shows that a space of preferences admits of a continuous, anonymous, and unanimous aggregation rule for every number of individuals if and only if this space is contractible. Furthermore, c...
متن کاملResolving the Topological Social Choice Paradox
1.1. Topological Social Choice Theory. Social choice theory aims to understand the nature of, and provide methods for, the aggregation of individual preferences to yield a social preference which is fair and satisfactory to individual voters on an axiomatic ground. An important example of this is in popular elections. In the 1980s, Chichilnisky and colleagues developed a topological approach pi...
متن کامل