A Finite-Model-Theoretic View on Propositional Proof Complexity
نویسندگان
چکیده
We establish new, and surprisingly tight, connections between propositional proof complexity and finite model theory. Specifically, we show that the power of several propositional proof systems, such as Horn resolution, bounded-width resolution, and the polynomial calculus of bounded degree, can be characterised in a precise sense by variants of fixed-point logics that are of fundamental importance in descriptive complexity theory. Our main results are that Horn resolution has the same expressive power as least fixed-point logic, that bounded-width resolution captures existential least fixed-point logic, and that the polynomial calculus with bounded degree over the rationals solves precisely the problems definable in fixed-point logic with counting. By exploring these connections further, we establish finite-model-theoretic tools for proving lower bounds for the polynomial calculus over the rationals and over finite fields.
منابع مشابه
The Model-Theoretic Expressiveness of Propositional Proof Systems
We establish new, and surprisingly tight, connections between propositional proof complexity and finite model theory. Specifically, we show that the power of several propositional proof systems, such as Horn resolution, bounded width resolution, and the polynomial calculus of bounded degree, can be characterised in a precise sense by variants of fixed-point logics that are of fundamental import...
متن کاملOn Classical Nonassociative Lambek Calculus
CNL, intoduced by de Groote and Lamarche [11], is a conservative extension of Nonassociative Lambek Calculus (NL) by a De Morgan negation ∼, satisfying A∼/B ⇔ A\B∼. [11] provides a fine theory of proof nets for CNL and shows cut elimination and polynomial decidability. Here the purely proof-theoretic approach of [11] is enriched with algebras and phase spaces for CNL. We prove that CNL is a str...
متن کاملEffectively Polynomial Simulations
We introduce a more general notion of efficient simulation between proof systems, which we call effectively-p simulation. We argue that this notion is more natural from a complexity-theoretic point of view, and by revisiting standard concepts in this light we obtain some surprising new results. First, we give several examples where effectively-p simulations are possible between different propos...
متن کاملLPC(ID): A Sequent Calculus Proof System for Propositional Logic Extended with Inductive Definitions
The logic FO(ID) uses ideas from the field of logic programming to extend first order logic with non-monotone inductive definitions. Such logic formally extends logic programming, abductive logic programming and datalog, and thus formalizes the view on these formalisms as logics of (generalized) inductive definitions. The goal of this paper is to study a deductive inference method for PC(ID), w...
متن کاملParameterized Proof Complexity: a Complexity Gap for Parameterized Tree-like Resolution
We propose a proof-theoretic approach for gaining evidence that certain parameterized problems are not fixed-parameter tractable. We consider proofs that witness that a given propositional formula cannot be satisfied by a truth assignment that sets at most k variables to true, considering k as the parameter. One could separate the parameterized complexity classes FPT and W[2] by showing that th...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- CoRR
دوره abs/1802.09377 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2018