Do People Anticipate Loss Aversion?
نویسندگان
چکیده
There is growing interest in the use of loss contracts that offer performance incentives as upfront payments that employees can lose. Standard behavioral models predict a tradeoff in the use of loss contracts: employees will work harder under loss contracts than under gain contracts; but, anticipating loss aversion, they will prefer gain contracts to loss contracts. In a series of experiments, we test these predictions by measuring performance and preferences for payoff-equivalent gain and loss contracts. We find that people indeed work harder under loss than gain contracts, as the theory predicts. Surprisingly, rather than a preference for the gain contract, we find that people actually prefer loss contracts. In exploring mechanisms for our results, we find suggestive evidence that people do anticipate loss aversion but select into loss contracts as a commitment device to improve performance. ∗Affiliations: Imas: Carnegie Mellon University and University of California San Diego; Sadoff: University of California San Diego; Samek: University of Southern California. We thank Christa Gibbs and Stephanie Schwartz for providing truly outstanding research assistance. This research has been conducted with IRB approval. Please direct correspondence to Sally Sadoff.
منابع مشابه
Loss Aversion in a Model of Loan Collateralization
In traditional bank theoretic modelling, agents are assumed to be perfectly rational. This assumption ignores the huge amount of evidence for systematic biases in individual decision making. In this paper, we present a model of collateralization under asymmetric information in which banks correctly anticipate that entrepreneurs are loss averse. Given a moral hazard problem of effort choice, we ...
متن کاملDeciding for Others Reduces Loss Aversion
We study risk taking on behalf of others, both when choices involve losses and when they do not. We conduct a large-scale incentivized experiment with subjects randomly drawn from the Danish population. On average, decision makers take the same risks for other people as for themselves when losses are excluded. In contrast, when losses are possible, decisions on behalf of others are more risky. ...
متن کاملRisk premiums and certainty equivalents of loss-averse newsvendors of bounded utility
Loss-averse behavior makes the newsvendors avoid the losses more than seeking the probable gains as the losses have more psychological impact on the newsvendor than the gains. In economics and decision theory, the classical newsvendor models treat losses and gains equally likely, by disregarding the expected utility when the newsvendor is loss-averse. Moreover, the use of unbounded utility to m...
متن کاملExplanations of the endowment effect: an integrative review.
The endowment effect is the tendency for people who own a good to value it more than people who do not. Its economic impact is consequential. It creates market inefficiencies and irregularities in valuation such as differences between buyers and sellers, reluctance to trade, and mere ownership effects. Traditionally, the endowment effect has been attributed to loss aversion causing sellers of a...
متن کاملBad riddance or good rubbish? Ownership and not loss aversion causes the endowment effect
People typically demand more to relinquish the goods they own than they would be willing to pay to acquire those goods if they did not already own them (the endowment effect). The standard economic explanation of this phenomenon is that people expect the pain of relinquishing a good to be greater than the pleasure of acquiring it (the loss aversion account). The standard psychological explanati...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Management Science
دوره 63 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2017